Council archive · source document
07/2277 - Operational Works - Landscaping [As Published] · 142007.2277
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 State-controlled road matters For more information refer to Guide 3. Undess you answered “none of the above’ t) Q2, Wn certain circumstances DMR wil be an advice agency, while.in other drasmstances DMR wit be a concurrence agency. Scheduse 2 of the IP Renulation wil assist you to determine where OMR is an advice or concurrence agency for the application. @ IDAS Assessment Checidist, Version 20, 2 Apri} 2007 2. ‘The application involves: (tick appiicabe box/es} (11) development on land contiguoust to a State controlled road and for - C1 (@) material change of use assessable agains! the planning scheme; DD (0) reconfiguring a tot unless - « the total number of lots is not increased; and « the total number of lots abutting the State-controlled road is not increased; 0 (©) operational work (not associated with @ material change of use assessable against the planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) ebove}- « associated with access to a State-controlied road; or © for filling or excavation; or « involving the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land, through a pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625 em? that directs stormwater to a State-controfled road. (© (i) development on land not contiguous to a State-controlled road and - 0 (2) material change of use - assessable against the local government's planing scheme; and mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by that schedule; (2 (b) reconfiguring a fot for a purpose mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by that schedule; (©) operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable agains! the planning scheme or reconfiguring @ lot mentioned in (b) above)~ assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and mentioned in schedute 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by that schedule. Bi (i) none of the above Clearing vegetation For more Information refer to Guide 12. Untess you answered "none of the above" to 03, : the application reauites assessment by the Degartment of Natural Resourees and Water (NRW). (tan agency other than NRW is the assessment * manager for the application, NRW is a concurrence agency for the appiication in retation to this matter, tyou Scked 03) of (), your application requires referral to NRW for assessment regardless of whether vegetation dearing fs proposed oF nat. 3 The application involves: (tick applicable boxes) (material change of use - (a) assessable against the planning scheme; (bd) on a lot containing - « acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of assessable vegetation; or « ifthere is no property map of assessable vegetation for the lot - remnant vegetation; (c)_ where the existing use of the land is a rural or environmental use; and (d) where the size of the land is 2 hectares or larger - complete Part J of Form 1 reconfiguring a lot — (a) ona lot containing a category 1, 2 or 3 area shown an a property map of assessable vegetation or, if there is no property map of assessable vegetation for the lot, remnant vegetation; (b) where the size of the lot before the reconfiguration Is 2 hectares or larger; (c) where 2 or more lots are created; and (d) where the size of any lot created is 25 hectares or smaller - complete Part J of Form 1 operational work - (a) for the clearing of native vegetation where the vegetation clearing is made assessable under Schedule 6 of the IPA; and (b) not associated with a material change of use assessable against the planning scheme mentioned in (|) or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (ii) - complete Part J of we (iv) none ofthe above. — Oi Citi Strategie port land ' For mare information refer to Guide 11. you ticked () - the relevant Port Authority is the assessment manager fer the appiication. , (fyou ticked (i) Queensland Transport fs a concurtence agency for the application. The application involves: (1 (i) development on strategic port land as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (TI Act) - complete Part! of Form 1 (i) a material change of use that is inconsistent with the land use plan approved under the TI Act for the strategic port land - complete Part! of Form 1 _Bifiij) none of the above — 4) Land contiguous to a Stato-controlled road is defined In schedule 14 of the IP Reguiaton to mean land - if part of the tand Is within 100m of the State-controted road; or that is past of a future State- conbolled road, Page 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/2277 - Operational Works - Landscaping [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.4 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.