Council archive · source document
Minor Change Letter · 51995.1645.01
Attached to the e-mail Lodgement of Development Application - 51995.1645.01.
19th May 2025
Our Ref: 25010
Council Ref: 51995.1645 (TPC2856 and 00439)
NOOSA COUNCIL
PO BOX 141
TEWANTIN, QLD, 4565
ATTENTION: The Chief Executive Officer
VIA EMAIL: [email protected]
Dear Sir,
MINOR CHANGE APPLICATION – DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR HOTEL
THE REEF HOTEL, 100/37- 49 NOOSA DRIVE, NOOSA HEADS, QLD, 4567 (ALSO
DECRIBED AS 19 NOOSA DRIVE)
LOT 100 ON SP147914
On behalf of the applicant, ALH Group Pty Ltd, we hereby make a change application to the
abovementioned Development Approval, pursuant to Clause 78 of the Planning Act 2016. In
summary, the change application seeks approval for minor amendments to the approved plans
for the hotel.
Please find enclosed the following documentation to facilitate Council’s assessment of the
request:
Planning Act Form 5, duly completed;
Owner Consent; and
Attachment 1 – Proposal Plans, prepared by Cayas & Ward.
Given the minor nature of the proposed changes, we believe that an application fee of
$2,617.00 should be payable for this request, and this will be paid on receipt of Council’s
invoice and reference number.
BACKGROUND
Council records confirm that an extension to the existing hotel and accommodation buildings
was approved in 1995, consisting of deck and servery extensions as well as alterations to the
existing hotel. It is understood that the relevant development approval now has a reference of
51995.1645 (TPC2856 and 00439) in the Council’s records.
DETAILS OF PROPOSED WORKS
The applicant is proposing to undertake refurbishment works at the Reef Hotel and the
following elements of this work require Council approval. Further details are provided in the
Proposal Plans, prepared by Cayas & Ward in Attachment 1.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 5 pages
Page 2
• Replacement of the existing awning over the entry to the gaming room which partly
overhangs the footpath. The awning will continue to provide weather protection and a
defined entry point to this part of the building from Noosa Drive. As the proposed
awning is lower and has a flatter profile than the existing, a new aluminium screen is
proposed above the awning to provide privacy to the outdoor terrace above.
• The removal of the large existing awning adjacent to the entrance to the Sports Bar
from Noosa Drive which overhangs the footpath. The associated works also introduce
new windows in this location to provide more natural light to the Sports Bar. A new,
smaller, awing is proposed above the windows to provide shade. As the proposed
awning is much smaller and lower than the existing, new screening is proposed above
it which continues into the site, along the side of the building. This change will help
screen the roof area from the street which will become visible with the removal of the
awning.
• The replacement of the existing awning and shade in front of the entrance to the Sports
Bar, which is set back from Noosa Drive. The proposed awning will continue to extend
over part of the outdoor area outside the Sports Bar. Other improvement works in this
area include the replacement of the picket fence, extending the picket fence into the
site to provide better definition to the outdoor area, provide additional privacy screening
within this area, resurfacing of the area with tiles and a widening of an existing door to
the Sports Bar to improve circulation between the indoor and outdoor areas.
PROPOSED AMENDEMENTS TO DECISION NOTICE
To formalise the proposed changes to the building, it is requested that the list of approved
drawings be amended to include the following Proposal Plans:
Drawing Title Drawing Issue Date
No.
Proposed Site Plan A100.00 D May 2025
Proposed Lower Ground Floor Plan A100.01 D May 2025
Proposed Upper Ground Floor Plan A100.02 D May 2025
Existing Level 1 Floor Plan A100.03 D May 2025
Existing West Elevation A100.04 D May 2025
Proposed West Elevation A100.05 A May 2025
MINOR CHANGE
The Planning Act 2016 defines a minor change as:
A minor change, for a development approval, is a change to the approval that —
i. would not result in a substantially different development; and
In this respect, the DA Rules state that “In determining whether the proposed change
would result in substantially different development, the assessment manager or referral
agency must consider the individual circumstances of the development, in the context
of the change proposed”.
Page 3
The DA Rule also includes the following tests to help determine if a change would result
in substantially different development:
Description / Provisions Comment / Response
A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the
proposed change:
• Involves a new use; or No new land use is proposed in this
change application.
• Results in the application applying to No new land is included in the
a new parcel of land; or development but this application.
• Dramatically changes the built form in Although the proposed works will have a
terms of scale, bulk and appearance; minor impact on the appearance of the
or existing building, they will not have a
significant impact on its scale, bulk and
overall appearance.
• Changes the ability of the proposed No changes are made to the proposed
development to operate as intended development that will impede its current
(for example, reducing the size of a operation.
retail complex may reduce the
capacity of the complex to service the
intended catchment); or
• Removes a component that is integral The proposed changes do not involve
to the operation of the development; removal of any components of the
or development that are integral to its
operation.
• Significantly impacts on traffic flow The proposed changes will not alter the
and the transport network, such as amount of traffic generated by the
increasing traffic to the site; or approved development and as such, will
have no impact on the external road
network.
• Introduces new impacts or increases The proposed changes do not introduce
the severity of known impacts; or any new impacts, nor will they increase
the severity of known impacts.
• Removes an incentive or offset No incentive, or offset components were
component that would have balanced included in the original approval.
the negative impact of the
development; or
• Impacts on infrastructure provisions. The amended development will not have
any different impacts on infrastructure
provisions.
Page 4
ii. if a development application for the development, including the change, were
made when the change application is made would not cause—
Description / Provisions Comment / Response
A. the inclusion of prohibited Prohibited development is proposed in
development in the application; or this change application.
B. referral to a referral agency, other No referrals are triggered by the
than to the chief executive, if there proposed works.
were no referral agencies for the
development application; or
C. referral to extra referral agencies, As above.
other than to the chief executive; or
D. a referral agency to assess the As above
application against, or have regard
to, matters prescribed by
regulation under section 55(2),
other than matters the referral
agency must have assessed the
application against, or have had
regard to, when the application was
made; or
E. public notification if public The proposed changes do not alter the
notification was not required for the level of the assessment.
development application.
Based on the assessment set out above, the proposed changes are consistent with the
definition of a minor change in the Planning Act 2016.
ASSESSMENT
Pursuant to Clause 81 (4) & (5) the responsible entity must consider the statutory
instrument, or other document, as in effect when the development application for the
development approval was properly made.
However, the responsible entity may give the weight the responsible entity considers is
appropriate, in the circumstances, to—
(a) the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change
application was made; or
(b) if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after
the change application is made but before it is decided—the amended or
replacement instrument or document; or
(c) another statutory instrument—
Page 5
(i) that comes into effect after the change application is made but before
it is decided; and
(ii) that the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the
instrument had been in effect when the development application for
the development approval was properly made.
As outlined above, the proposed changes involve replacing three existing awnings. Two of the
new awnings, which face Noosa Drive, are smaller in size and will reduce the extent of
encroachment into the road reserve. Additional improvements include new screening for the
outdoor terrace and above the new awning, as well as minor works near the Sports Bar. These
enhancements are intended to improve both the functionality and appearance of the area.
Overall, the proposed changes will enhance the building’s appearance and strengthen its
contribution to the streetscapes of Noosa Drive and Hibiscus Avenue. As such, the amended
design is considered to remain consistent with the intent and conditions of the original
development approval. Furthermore, the proposed design aligns with the relevant outcomes
sought for the Tourist Accommodation Zone under the Noosa Plan 2020, for the following
reasons:
• The proposed changes will not alter the overall scale and bulk of the existing building
and the impact that it currently has on the street.
• The changes will not have any adverse impacts on the surrounding premises in terms
of privacy, views and access to sunlight.
• The proposed amendments will not affect any existing vegetation or landscaping on
the site.
• The proposed works will not alter the existing setbacks of the building to the street.
For the reasons outlined above, it is considered that the proposed changes to the approved
building are in keeping with the original development approval and are consistent with the
outcomes sought by the current Noosa Plan and therefore warrant Council’s support.
CONCLUSIONS
This application seeks approval for minor changes to the approved plans for the existing Hotel
building at The Reef, Noosa, 37 – 49 Noosa Drive, Noosa Heads (also known as 19 Noosa
Drive), which is legally described as Lot 100 on SP147914. The proposed works, which are
part of a planned refurbishment of the Hotel, will improve its external appearance and the
contribution that it makes to the character of the local streetscapes.
The assessment set out above confirms that the proposed changes are consistent with the
definition of a minor change in the Planning Act 2016 and demonstrates that the amended
design outcome remains consistent with the original development approval and the current
outcomes sought by the Noosa Plan 2020.
For the reasons outlined above, we request that Council approved this minor change
application and amend the current development approval, 51995.1645 (TPC2856 and 00439)
to include the Proposal Plans in Attachment 1 as Approved Plans.
Page 6
Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct. Yours faithfully PROJECT URBAN Mick Sheppard Director Email: [email protected]
Used in these records
Minor Change Letter.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 307 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.