Recommendation - Noosa Iconic Panel - 010.2009.00001024.001 [As Published] · 132009.1024

Page 10 of 12


[OCR of page images]
ecoaccess

narrate! Aooazes and per
Notice

Concurrence Agency Response

 

Concurrence agency response
Sections 3.3.16 and 3.3.18 integrated Planning Act 1997

Development Gescription

o Reconfiguration of a Lot

3 Material Change of Use

where:

Oo the existing use of the land fs, or if the kand is vacant land with no existing use the most
recent use of the land was, for a notifi jable acilvily under the Fnvitonmental Protection

: Act 1994, ’

O .. the proposed use of the land is for vhitd care, educational, recreational, residential’ ‘or 7
similar purposes and the existing use of the land is, or if the land 1s vacant land vith no

- _ existing use the most recent use of the land was? for an industriat activity. 17

a the land is on the Environmental Management Register or Contaminatad Land Register
under tha Environmental Protection Act 7994.

Oo the land is vholly or partly within an area for which an Area Management Advice for
industrial activity or natural mineralisation has been issued and the propased use of the
jand ie for child cara, educational, recreational, residential or similar purposes.

the land is wholly or partly in an area for which an Area Management Advice for
unexploded ordnance has been issued.

The concurrence agency response Is that

The EPA is a concurrence agency for the applicaliun pursuant to the lollawing itam/s of the
inteyrated Planning Regulation 1998:

oO Nem 21(b), Table 2 of Schedule 2 of the integrated Planning Regulation 1999

8 Nem 12, Table 3 of Schedule 2 of the integrated Planning Regulation 7993

The application has been assessed and it has been decided that:
condilons must attach la any development approvat

any approval must be fer part only of the development
any approval must be a preliminary approval only

there are.o concurrence agency requirements

the application must be refused

_ coos

Reasons for inclusion of. development condi ions or refusal - , ,

Gia accordenne with sacton 3. Rr TB atthe fategratad Plank ng Act (997 atns section 278 of tire Acts frterprecition Act
1954, a concurrence response must include ceasons fora refuset ar for the inciusiog of develoumen! conditions.)

The site {the subject lot/s) is part ot an area of land within which the Department of Defence
(Defence) has assessed a ‘substantial risk of residual UXO contamination exists. Visit the Defence
website httpvAwww.detence.gov.au/uxo/ for delails.

Defence advises that development or land use rezoning proposals for land wilhin a ‘substantial’ zone
should only proceed following the conduct of UXO investigation and clearance activities. Defence
maintains g list of commercial UXO investigation and ramedial search contractors that it accredits to
carry out Ihis work.

Defence also recommends thal owners or occupiers of potentially affected land and workers and
contractors employed on ihe land need ta be aware of the procedure it a suspecl object is found.

 

Department of Enviraamem and Resource Management

Page 10 of 12