Original source · versioned page text
Noosa Plan Submission 17 December 2015 - Final submission table
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission (1) Object - Jennifer Drysdale.
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Specific Outcomes Applicant’s Response Submitter’s Response
09 Parking areas are located O9 Complies Non-compliant
where they will not unduly Car parking is located at the The carparking proposed on site
conflict with pedestrians and will front of the building, the will expose more pedestrians
not dominate the streetscape (particularly GSLC students) in
most suitable location for a
the area to moving vehicles.
service station use.
011 Access and egress points do S11.1 Complies Non-compliant
not impact on the safety and There is an increased risk of
operations of the road system queuing back from the access
point as population density
increases. With the secondary
development and proposed
carparking in the second Lot (as
per the developer’s “concept
plan”), the shared easement will
be further congested and cause
interruptions to traffic flow out
on the main road.
014 Provision is made for O14 Complies Non-compliant
pedestrian and vehicular queues Can comply via condition No provision is made for
at conflict points where applicable. vehicular queues.
The DA will significantly affect
traffic on the Eumundi Noosa
Road, the roundabout outside
the GSLC entrance and
pedestrians (predominantly
children) on the footpath
entrance, in the event of queuing
to access the proposed
Development. The Applicant has
provided no objective analysis of
the likely queuing frequency or
extent of same.
018 Development with the It is not considered that the Non-compliant
potential to generate significant development has the In view of the compounding
traffic and parking impacts gives potential to generate effects of constructing two
appropriate consideration to significant traffic and additional service stations (ie. at
transport and land use issues parking impacts. both 115 and 139 Eumundi Road)
in the immediate vicinity, this
outcome is not met.
Applicant’s Response to Noosa Council’s Information Request
80. The applicant has failed to provide adequate responses to the Noosa Council’s
Request for Information relating to traffic issues, as set out in the Table below.
Information Required Applicant’s Response Submitter’s Response
Issue - Traffic
There are concerns with the potential for queuing in the road and traffic conflict in the shared access
area (easement area), particularly in association with the future industry/retail development on the
20
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original