Original source · versioned page text
Noosa Plan Submission 17 December 2015 - Final submission table
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission (1) Object - Jennifer Drysdale.
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Specific Outcome of Code Applicant’s Assessment Submitter’s Assessment
O33 Traffic generated by the S33.1 Complies Does not Comply
development is within the acceptable The development will comply It is the applicant’s responsibility to establish
capacity of external roads and does where reasonably applicable. how the DA complies with the Code. The
not have an adverse impact upon the applicant has not satisfied this criterion as no
functioning of the road network details have been provided as to how the DA
achieves this specific outcome. “Reasonably
applicable” is indeterminate. The DA has an
adverse impact upon the functioning of the
road network. The Applicant has failed to
provide objective evidence or argument to
show otherwise.
BUSINESS USES CODE
O20 Development is designed and O20 Complies Does not Comply
sited to avoid noise emissions that The proposed development It is the applicant’s responsibility to establish
unreasonably diminish the amenity of is suitably distance and how the DA complies with the Code. The
the area or surrounding uses. buffered through landscaping applicant has not satisfied this criteria as
from sensitive land uses. sufficient details have not been provided as
Further, as the site is located to how the DA achieves this specific
on a busy road and outcome. It is considered that the DA is not
roundabout, it is considered suitably distanced or buffered from the
that there will be no adjacent GSLC which is a sensitive land use.
worsening effects in terms of
noise. The applicant’s statement that “it is
considered that there will be no worsening
effects in terms of noise” is not supported
with objective evidence, such as detailed
studies showing existing background noise
levels and projected additional noise
generation, particularly given the DA’s
proximity to the noise sensitive study
environment of the GSLC.
O27 Buildings and structures are S27.1 Complies Does not Comply
designed to minimise opportunities The proposed development All such facilities are conducive to loitering
for vandalism. will incorporates a building and provide opportunities for concealment
design and layout which will which poses an unacceptable danger to the
provide for non-graffiti students going to and from the GSLC
friendly development, particularly in early mornings or evenings
structures and layout before or after extracurricular school
through design within an activities. Furthermore, the close proximity
absence of natural ladders, of such a facility poses and unacceptable risk
minimal unbroken vertical to the security of the GSLC premises and its
surface areas, CCTV students.
surveillance, a small retail
30
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original