Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

Noosa Plan Submission 17 December 2015 - Final submission table

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission (1) Object - Jennifer Drysdale.

of 37

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Log in to see the plans as drawn
Specific Outcome of Code               Applicant’s Assessment            Submitter’s Assessment

O33 Traffic generated by the           S33.1 Complies                    Does not Comply
development is within the acceptable   The development will comply       It is the applicant’s responsibility to establish
capacity of external roads and does    where reasonably applicable.      how the DA complies with the Code. The
not have an adverse impact upon the                                      applicant has not satisfied this criterion as no
functioning of the road network                                          details have been provided as to how the DA
                                                                         achieves this specific outcome. “Reasonably
                                                                         applicable” is indeterminate. The DA has an
                                                                         adverse impact upon the functioning of the
                                                                         road network. The Applicant has failed to
                                                                         provide objective evidence or argument to
                                                                         show otherwise.

BUSINESS USES CODE

O20 Development is designed and        O20 Complies                      Does not Comply
sited to avoid noise emissions that    The proposed development          It is the applicant’s responsibility to establish
unreasonably diminish the amenity of   is suitably distance and          how the DA complies with the Code. The
the area or surrounding uses.          buffered through landscaping      applicant has not satisfied this criteria as
                                       from sensitive land uses.         sufficient details have not been provided as
                                       Further, as the site is located   to how the DA achieves this specific
                                       on a busy road and                outcome. It is considered that the DA is not
                                       roundabout, it is considered      suitably distanced or buffered from the
                                       that there will be no             adjacent GSLC which is a sensitive land use.
                                       worsening effects in terms of
                                       noise.                            The applicant’s statement that “it is
                                                                         considered that there will be no worsening
                                                                         effects in terms of noise” is not supported
                                                                         with objective evidence, such as detailed
                                                                         studies showing existing background noise
                                                                         levels and projected additional noise
                                                                         generation, particularly given the DA’s
                                                                         proximity to the noise sensitive study
                                                                         environment of the GSLC.

O27 Buildings and structures are       S27.1 Complies                    Does not Comply
designed to minimise opportunities     The proposed development          All such facilities are conducive to loitering
for vandalism.                         will incorporates a building      and provide opportunities for concealment
                                       design and layout which will      which poses an unacceptable danger to the
                                       provide for non-graffiti          students going to and from the GSLC
                                       friendly development,             particularly in early mornings or evenings
                                       structures and layout             before or after extracurricular school
                                       through design within an          activities. Furthermore, the close proximity
                                       absence of natural ladders,       of such a facility poses and unacceptable risk
                                       minimal unbroken vertical         to the security of the GSLC premises and its
                                       surface areas, CCTV               students.
                                       surveillance, a small retail

                                                                                                              30
Log in to download the original file

Noosa Plan Submission 17 December 2015 - Final submission table.pdf · 1.2 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.