Original source · versioned page text
SARA RFI - Ecological Assessment Report
Very large file (67.6 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 189, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT 4-1
4 ERP SITE IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE
The following table identifies EMP measures that will need to be undertaken during the
implementation of the ERP.
Element 2: Vegetation and Fauna Protection
Policy: To effectively manage ERP operations within plan area and minimise impact (refer
Figure 1.1)
Strategy: To identify and protect vegetation that is to be retained and enhanced in an
environmentally sensitive manner and protect fauna.
Responsibility: ERP Contractor and Restoration Ecologist
Management Actions:
This section of the EMP deals with key management measures for ERP operations within the areas as
indicated on final approved engineering drawings (as advised by Superintendent). The ERP
contractor’s works shall be limited to within the fenced areas as indicated on approved drawings as
above and Ken Hicks & Associates drawing 1128 Master Plan and excluding:
- RHD and RSL building envelopes;
- Road reserve landscaped;
- Road reserve constructed road;
- Service corridors within Park and POSCWP areas (to be restored once engineering works are
complete).
Actions are as follows:
1. The ERP provides the actions to be undertaken in terms of ecological restoration, species
selection, etc.
2. All activities in the ERP area are to be carried out in such a manner as to minimise any damage to
the conserved vegetation and protected trees.
3. Any clearing of vegetation in the ERP area is to be undertaken following meetings by the ERP
Contractor with the Restoration Ecologist, Project Manager and Council representative.
4. The Restoration Ecologist is to supervise clearing of undesirable species and other activities in the
areas adjacent to protected vegetation and any other significant areas to be retained and enhanced.
The Restoration Ecologist will be responsible for informing all relevant personnel of the location
of significant areas for clearing and weed control.
5. The Habitat Protection fencing with the clearing/ development envelope associated with the RHD
and RSL areas is to be checked on a weekly basis.
S:\PROJECT MANAGEMENT\4.0 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT SITE\MANAGEMENT PLANS\EMP 3 (WBM OCEANICS).DOC 8/10/07 14:10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.