Original source · versioned page text
Minor Change Application_301017
Attached to the e-mail Change to Development Approval - MCU14/0102.07.
Comment: the proposed change will not introduce or increase the severity of new or
known impacts.
Removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced the negative impact
of the development; or
Comment: not applicable as the proposed deletion of condition 114 b does not relate to
incentives or offsets of this nature.
Impacts on infrastructure provisions.
Comment: There will be no impact on infrastructure provision as a result of the proposed
change.
ii. if a development application for the development, including the change, were made
when the change application is made would not cause—
A. the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
Comment: the deletion of condition 114 b does not introduce prohibited
development.
B. referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, if there were
no referral agencies for the development application; or
Comment: the proposed change does not trigger referral.
C. referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or
Comment: not applicable as there were no referral agencies for the original
application.
D. a referral agency to assess the application against, or have regard to, matters
prescribed by regulation under section 55(2), other than matters the referral
agency must have assessed the application against, or have had regard to,
when the application was made; or
Comment: not applicable as there were no referral agencies for the original
application.
E. public notification if public notification was not required for the
development application.
Comment: the proposed deletion of condition 114 b does not trigger public
notification.
Accordingly, we are of the view that the proposed change can be deemed a “minor change”.
MINOR CHANGE ASSESSMENT
This minor change application is to be assessed against the relevant matters set out in Section 81 of
the Planning Act 2016. These relevant matters are addressed below.
Firstly, there were 14 properly made submissions received for the original application. Of these
submissions, 13 supported the proposed development and only 1 submission voiced concerns with the
proposal at the time. Of all the submissions, none mentioned any concerns regarding signage.
3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.