Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Council archive · source document

P & E Court Appeal No 344 of 2009 Judgement 5/07/13 - Hofmann · 152006.1999

of 36

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

                                                                                                                                i
                                                                                                                                i
 ecoaccess
          emiromontaf llamcos andpormlts


                                                                                                                  Notice

                                                                  Concurrence Agency Response
 • The Environmental Protection Agency is recognised as a concurrence agency under the Integrated
       Planning Amendment Regulation (No. 1) 1998 for coastal management, other than amenity and aesthetic
        significance or value.

The Activity for which this development approval is Issued Is simply a restatement of the activity as prescribed in
the legislation at the time of issuing this development approval. Where (here is any conflict between the above
description of the Activity for which this development approval is issued and the conditions as specified in this
development approval as to the scale, intensity or manner of carrying out of the Activity, then such conditions
prevail to the extent of the inconsistency.

This development approval authorises the Activity. It does not authorise environmental harm unless a
concurrence agency condition within this development approval explicitly authorises that harm. Where there is
no condition or the development approval is silent on a matter, the lack of a condition or silence shall not be
construed as authorising harm.

As part of the concurrence agency response the following development conditions are to be attached to the
development approval:


Conditions:
Agency Interest: Coastal
    1. The works must be undertaken in accordance with the plan listed below.

Plan:
     • Proposal Plan M1776-02C prepared by Jones Flint & Pike dated 21 September 2007.

Additional information for applicants:
    It is a requirement of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 that if the owner or occupier of this site
    becomes av/are a Notifiable Activity (as defined under Schedule 2 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994)
    is being carried out on this land or that the land has been affected by a hazardous contaminant, they must,
    within twenty two (22) business days after becoming aware the activity is being carried out, give notice to the
    Environmental Protection Agency. A list of Notifiable Activities is provided within Schedule 2 of the
    Environmental Protection Act 1994.

    This concurrence response pursuant to the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and assessed against section 104
    oHh<!}-Geaet&l-ProteQtion-and-Management-Aet-1-995-doe8-mi-remQve-\;he-med-\Q-ob[a\n-ar\y-1u?{her
    approvals for this development wiilcFTrnay be re^uirecTpursuanffolhis or ofher legislation, both~&tate and
    Commonwealth. Applicants are advised to check with all relevant statutory authorities for such approvals as
    may be required.

Additional information forth© Assessment Manager:

    The Environmental Protection Agency referral agency jurisdiction for the development application is confined
    to that aspect of the application involving the triggers identified in the response. EPA has no referral
    agency jurisdiction in relation to other aspects of the development application.
    in this regard it should be noted that the State Coastal Management Plan 2001 and SEQ Regional Coastal
    Management Plan 2006 which, for the purposes of making a statutory decision, has the same effect as a
    state planning policy. The assessment manager is required to give due consideration to the relevant State
    planning policies when deciding the application.




                           Version 1.1
                                                                                         QueenslandGovernment
vEnylroflhwnfal Protection Agency                                                        Environmental Protocllon Agency
Viww.ej)a.qld.gov.au ABN 87 221 168 786                                                  Queensland Paiks and Wildlife Servko

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.9 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

P & E Court Appeal No 344 of 2009 Judgement 5_07_13 - Hofmann.pdf · 1.9 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.