Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Council archive · source document

response to information request 33 ross · MCU24/0094

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

         Senior Planning Officer – Regional Assessment and Projects
         Planning and Development Services, Planning Group
         Department of Housing, Local Government, Planning and Public Works
         P 07 4122 0407
         E [email protected]
         123 Wharf Street, Maryborough QLD 4650
         PO Box 839, Maryborough QLD 4650



         9. Recalculate the EPA using a storm tide level of 2.21m AHD within the
             Vellinga equation for the design storm event component (C), to offset
             uncertainty regarding findings of the Aurecon (2013) study. Update the
             coastal hazard assessment report accordingly.
         10. Provide a reassessment of the slope stability and update the
             geotechnical report accordingly, assuming the following:
                a. no shear pile wall is in place;
                b. piled foundations supporting the proposed dwelling; and
                c. the recalculated EPA as per request 1 above (or an EPA of 102m
                    if it is not recalculated as per request matter 1).

Coastal Engineers Royal Haskoning provides a further address to Council’s request for a
recalculation of the coastal hazard assessment, based on recent calculations along
Sunshine Beach. The Noosa Plan is also not fully integrated with the relevant State
Interests and that any assumptions for coastal modelling should be endorsed by the
State’s Principal Coastal Scientist.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to the Development Assessment Rules, the applicant has given the assessment
manager the information requested. Please proceed with the processing of the application
at your earliest convenience.

If you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact
myself.

Regards,




Jack Lewis B.Sc Hons UNSW M.Plan Otago
Planner/Director
Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
0406 334 227




                                                                                                      Page 4 of 4


[OCR of page images]
Senior Planning Officer - Regional Assessment and Projects

Planning and Development Services, Planning Group

Department of Housing, Local Government, Planning and Public Works
P 07 4122 0407

E [email protected]
123 Wharf Street, Maryborough QLD 4650
PO Box 839, Maryborough QLD 4650

9. Recalculate the EPA using a storm tide level of 2.21m AHD within the
Vellinga equation for the design storm event component (C), to offset
uncertainty regarding findings of the Aurecon (2013) study. Update the
coastal hazard assessment report accordingly.

10. Provide a reassessment of the slope stability and update the
geotechnical report accordingly, assuming the following:

a. no shear pile wall is in place;

b. piled foundations supporting the proposed dwelling; and

c. the recalculated EPA as per request 1 above (or an EPA of 102m
if it is not recalculated as per request matter 1).

Coastal Engineers Royal Haskoning provides a further address to Council’s request for a
recalculation of the coastal hazard assessment, based on recent calculations along
Sunshine Beach. The Noosa Plan is also not fully integrated with the relevant State
Interests and that any assumptions for coastal modelling should be endorsed by the
State’s Principal Coastal Scientist.

2.1.1 State interests in the state planning policy not integrated or partly integrated

State Planning Policy (July 2017):
+ Natural hazards, risk and resilience - coastal hazards - in part

Editor’s Note — Development in the erosion prone area, as shown on the SPP interactive mapping system, will be subject to assessment against
the assessment benchmarks — natural hazards, risk and resilience within the State Planning Policy.

 

Pursuant to the Development Assessment Rules, the applicant has given the assessment
manager the information requested. Please proceed with the processing of the application
at your earliest convenience.

If you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact
myself.

Regards,

Jack Lewis B.sc Hons UNSW M.Plan Otago
Planner/Director

Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
0406 334 227

Page 4 of 4

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.4 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

response to information request 33 ross.pdf · 1.4 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.