Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 3 - Further advice from Gondwana Ecology.pdf
Gondwana Ecology Group Pty Ltd
ABN 20 143 747 326
PO Box 535
Kenmore
QLD 4069
9 February 2023
Attention: Phil Starkey
c/o Shane Adamson
Adamson Town Planning Pty Ltd
PO Box 894
COOROY QLD 4563
Mr Starkey
RE: UPDATED LAYOUT - FURTHER INFORMATION FOR COUNCIL – PROPOSED “BOUTIQUE HOTEL” AT 61
NOOSA SPRINGS DRIVE, NOOSA HEADS
1.0 Background
This letter provides an updated to the information provided to Council in the document dated 11 November
2022. I understand the proposed development has been further refined to remove the tennis courts from
the mapped koala habitat area. This means that no koala habitat trees within the mapped area are required
to be removed. The revised layout is provided in Attachment A.
The land is part of the existing Noosa Springs Golf Estate with the subject site formally identified as Lot 4
on SP 178340 and encompasses some 3.8ha. The proposed development is for the redevelopment of part
of the land for a luxury boutique hotel.
Gondwana Ecology Group prepared an ecological assessment report dated February 2020 and provided
additional information to Council and the State Assessment Referral Agency (SARA). The proposal includes
the redevelopment of the land generally associated with the Noosa Springs Golf and Spa Resort, including
the existing tennis courts, ancillary buildings and landscaped/planted beds surrounding these structures.
Vegetation, primarily regrowth and planted vegetation (including native vegetation and trees) will be
removed as part of the proposal. The new layout avoids removal of koala habitat trees in the northern part
of the land.
2.0 Meeting with Council
A meeting was held on site with Council 1 on 31 October 2022. The vegetated portion of the land
surrounding the existing tennis courts and ancillary buildings was inspected.
Council have requested further information regarding tree retention and removal (particularly koala
habitat/feed trees – i.e. brushbox, gums, bloodwoods 2) for the balance land (i.e. land outside the koala
mapped area in the north). In addition information regarding any she-oak (Allocasuarina species).
1 Meeting - David Burrows (Conservation Partnerships Officer) and Patrick Murphy (Coordinator Planning) with Phil Starkey
(Noosa Springs) and Shane Adamson (Adamson Town Planning).
2 Typical koala habitat/feed trees in the location of the proposed development.
Gondwana Ecology Group Pty Ltd 1
[OCR of page images]
Gondwana Ecology Group Pty Ltd
ABN 20 143 747 326
PO Box 535
Kenmore
QLD 4069
9 February 2023
Attention: Phil Starkey
c/o Shane Adamson
Adamson Town Planning Pty Ltd
PO Box 894
COOROY QLD 4563
Mr Starkey
RE: UPDATED LAYOUT - FURTHER INFORMATION FOR COUNCIL — PROPOSED “BOUTIQUE HOTEL” AT 61
NOOSA SPRINGS DRIVE, NOOSA HEADS
1.0 Background
This letter provides an updated to the information provided to Council in the document dated 11 November
2022. | understand the proposed development has been further refined to remove the tennis courts from
the mapped koala habitat area. This means that no koala habitat trees within the mapped area are required
to be removed. The revised layout is provided in Attachment A.
The land is part of the existing Noosa Springs Golf Estate with the subject site formally identified as Lot 4
on SP 178340 and encompasses some 3.8ha. The proposed development is for the redevelopment of part
of the land for a luxury boutique hotel.
Gondwana Ecology Group prepared an ecological assessment report dated February 2020 and provided
additional information to Council and the State Assessment Referral Agency (SARA). The proposal includes
the redevelopment of the land generally associated with the Noosa Springs Golf and Spa Resort, including
the existing tennis courts, ancillary buildings and landscaped/planted beds surrounding these structures.
Vegetation, primarily regrowth and planted vegetation (including native vegetation and trees) will be
removed as part of the proposal. The new layout avoids removal of koala habitat trees in the northern part
of the land.
2.0 Meeting with Council
A meeting was held on site with Council’ on 31 October 2022. The vegetated portion of the land
surrounding the existing tennis courts and ancillary buildings was inspected.
Council have requested further information regarding tree retention and removal (particularly koala
habitat/feed trees — i.e. brushbox, gums, bloodwoods?) for the balance land (i.e. land outside the koala
mapped area in the north). In addition information regarding any she-oak (A//ocasuarina species).
1 Meeting - David Burrows (Conservation Partnerships Officer) and Patrick Murphy (Coordinator Planning) with Phil Starkey
(Noosa Springs) and Shane Adamson (Adamson Town Planning).
2 Typical koala habitat/feed trees in the location of the proposed development.
Gondwana Ecology Group Pty Ltd 1
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Attachment 3 - Further advice from Gondwana Ecology.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 8 pages
Page 2
3.0 Tree Survey
The vegetated part of the land surrounding the tennis courts was surveyed on 7 November 2022. It is
acknowledged that the survey is not a detailed survey 3 and the following methodology was employed:
• State koala mapping and Council biodiversity mapping was disregarded, and the area treated
equally for the purposes of the tree count;
• The area was divided into four broad area based upon the location of the land, patch of vegetation
and the extent of earthworks (refer Figure 1 in Attachment B);
• The areas of earthworks (tree removal) vs no earthworks (tree retention) were qualified by
reference to the Walsh Earthworks Layout Plan, the Marchese Partners Site Plan and a recent
Nearmap aerial photograph;
• A manual count through site traverses was undertaken for trees generally greater than 150mm
diameter at breast height (DBH); and
• Within each area the trees to be retained vs the trees to be removed were counted.
The four survey areas (Figure 1), include:
• Area 1 – area in west between the existing car park and tennis courts – no earthworks proposed
with the area of vegetation being retained and embellished as a landscape area. This area is not
mapped under any overlays and includes a combination of natural vegetation and landscaped
plantings (e.g. palms, lilly pilly).
• Area 2 – area in north between existing tennis courts and Resort Drive. Vegetation on subject land
is fenced. This area includes a portion that is mapped as koala habitat and Council biodiversity
mapping which extends to the west. Trees beyond the fence (subject land boundary) in the
northwest and northeast (being part of the “patch”) were also counted. The development in this
location now proposes no tree clearing with retention of a patch of vegetation (and koala habitat
trees) in the north.
• Area 3 – area is located in the east between the existing tennis courts and the subject land boundary
fence (and Resort Drive) and includes mostly regrowth brushbox with cleared areas and buildings.
Vegetation retention in this location is restricted to a band along the fence.
• Area 4 – area is located in the southeast and is setback from Resort Drive. The area is to be
landscaped with retained vegetation. She-oaks, regrowth brushbox and planted trees occur
(including palms, figs and lilly pilly).
In addition to the count for koala (and other large) trees in the four areas, all she-oak trees were counted.
It was also recorded whether the trees supported cone and if any of the trees exhibited evidence of
cockatoo feeding, i.e. orts (chewed cones).
The result of the tree counts per area are provided in the tables in Attachment B. In summary, based on
the survey count, 63 koala feed trees (gums, bloodwood or brushbox) will be removed. The majority (>50)
of the koala trees to be removed are brushbox 4.
3 A detailed survey was completed for the area mapped as koala habitat.
4 A species regarded as a koala habitat tree by definition but not necessarily a preferred feed tree.
2
[OCR of page images]
3.0 Tree Survey
The vegetated part of the land surrounding the tennis courts was surveyed on 7 November 2022. It is
acknowledged that the survey is not a detailed survey? and the following methodology was employed:
e State koala mapping and Council biodiversity mapping was disregarded, and the area treated
equally for the purposes of the tree count;
e The area was divided into four broad area based upon the location of the land, patch of vegetation
and the extent of earthworks (refer Figure 1 in Attachment B);
e The areas of earthworks (tree removal) vs no earthworks (tree retention) were qualified by
reference to the Walsh Earthworks Layout Plan, the Marchese Partners Site Plan and a recent
Nearmap aerial photograph;
e A manual count through site traverses was undertaken for trees generally greater than 150mm
diameter at breast height (DBH); and
e Within each area the trees to be retained vs the trees to be removed were counted.
The four survey areas (Figure 1), include:
e Area 1 — area in west between the existing car park and tennis courts — no earthworks proposed
with the area of vegetation being retained and embellished as a landscape area. This area is not
mapped under any overlays and includes a combination of natural vegetation and landscaped
plantings (e.g. palms, lilly pilly).
e Area 2-—area in north between existing tennis courts and Resort Drive. Vegetation on subject land
is fenced. This area includes a portion that is mapped as koala habitat and Council biodiversity
mapping which extends to the west. Trees beyond the fence (subject land boundary) in the
northwest and northeast (being part of the “patch”) were also counted. The development in this
location now proposes no tree clearing with retention of a patch of vegetation (and koala habitat
trees) in the north.
e Area 3-—area is located in the east between the existing tennis courts and the subject land boundary
fence (and Resort Drive) and includes mostly regrowth brushbox with cleared areas and buildings.
Vegetation retention in this location is restricted to a band along the fence.
e Area 4 — area is located in the southeast and is setback from Resort Drive. The area is to be
landscaped with retained vegetation. She-oaks, regrowth brushbox and planted trees occur
(including palms, figs and lilly pilly).
In addition to the count for koala (and other large) trees in the four areas, all she-oak trees were counted.
It was also recorded whether the trees supported cone and if any of the trees exhibited evidence of
cockatoo feeding, i.e. orts (chewed cones).
The result of the tree counts per area are provided in the tables in Attachment B. In summary, based on
the survey count, 63 koala feed trees (gums, bloodwood or brushbox) will be removed. The majority (>50)
of the koala trees to be removed are brushbox*.
3 A detailed survey was completed for the area mapped as koala habitat.
4 A species regarded as a koala habitat tree by definition but not necessarily a preferred feed tree.
Page 3
Of the 26 she-oak trees counted, 11 exhibited cones. Of the trees, seven will be removed, three of which
have cones. No she-oak trees exhibited evidence of being used as a cockatoo feed tree 5.
The count also noted another 20 koala feed trees and another nine she-oak trees within the verge,
vegetated patches immediately beyond the subject land, between the boundary fence and Resort Drive,
which won’t be affected by the development of the site (refer Attachment B).
4.0 Koala Offset
As reported previously, in accordance with the State Offset legislation, the project had proposed to deliver
“offsets” by way of financial payment which could be a condition of approval. As no koala habitat trees will
be removed within the mapped area (in the north) a financial contribution is no longer necessary.
Regardless of the new layout, fewer trees to be removed and no trees removed in the mapped koala area,
it was recommended in early 2022 that at least 60 koala trees be planted on the golf course 6. Suitable
planting locations have previously been identified.
5.0 Recommendations
Noting that 63 (in total) koala trees will be removed, and regardless of the mapping (or absence of mapping)
it is recommended that an additional 60 koala trees be planted within the golf course to offset the tree
removal on the site (i.e. now 120 in total – ratio of approximately 2:1). I would recommend planting
E.tereticornis or similar as these trees are preferred over brushbox which would be considered a
“secondary” food species.
Further to the koala tree planting I would also recommend that in the order of 25 (ratio of more than 3:1)
she-oak be planted amongst the 120 koala tree plantings.
The additional koala tree and she-oak tree planting can be a condition of approval, including the long term
maintenance.
The bushland patch north of the existing tennis courts will now be retained as a larger patch. It is
recommended (can be a condition of approval) that this area be treated for weeds (noting the weed
dominated understorey).
In addition to the compensatory planting, I note that the landscaping plan (Place Design) includes the use
of brushbox in two of the planting areas. This would essentially replace the brushbox in these locations
following development.
5 Note: as reported previously there is historical evidence (pers.obs.) of feeding activity along the road verge, beyond the subject
land fence.
6 It is noted that both Lots 3 & 4 on SP178340 are under covenant and cannot be sold separately.
3
[OCR of page images]
Of the 26 she-oak trees counted, 11 exhibited cones. Of the trees, seven will be removed, three of which
have cones. No she-oak trees exhibited evidence of being used as a cockatoo feed tree®.
The count also noted another 20 koala feed trees and another nine she-oak trees within the verge,
vegetated patches immediately beyond the subject land, between the boundary fence and Resort Drive,
which won't be affected by the development of the site (refer Attachment B).
4.0 Koala Offset
As reported previously, in accordance with the State Offset legislation, the project had proposed to deliver
“offsets” by way of financial payment which could be a condition of approval. As no koala habitat trees will
be removed within the mapped area (in the north) a financial contribution is no longer necessary.
Regardless of the new layout, fewer trees to be removed and no trees removed in the mapped koala area,
it was recommended in early 2022 that at least 60 koala trees be planted on the golf course®. Suitable
planting locations have previously been identified.
5.0 Recommendations
Noting that 63 (in total) koala trees will be removed, and regardless of the mapping (or absence of mapping)
it is recommended that an additional 60 koala trees be planted within the golf course to offset the tree
removal on the site (i.e. now 120 in total — ratio of approximately 2:1). | would recommend planting
E.tereticornis or similar as these trees are preferred over brushbox which would be considered a
“secondary” food species.
Further to the koala tree planting | would also recommend that in the order of 25 (ratio of more than 3:1)
she-oak be planted amongst the 120 koala tree plantings.
The additional koala tree and she-oak tree planting can be a condition of approval, including the long term
maintenance.
The bushland patch north of the existing tennis courts will now be retained as a larger patch. It is
recommended (can be a condition of approval) that this area be treated for weeds (noting the weed
dominated understorey).
In addition to the compensatory planting, | note that the landscaping plan (Place Design) includes the use
of brushbox in two of the planting areas. This would essentially replace the brushbox in these locations
following development.
5 Note: as reported previously there is historical evidence (pers.obs.) of feeding activity along the road verge, beyond the subject
land fence.
© It is noted that both Lots 3 & 4 on SP178340 are under covenant and cannot be sold separately.
Page 4
I would also recommend additional ecological enhancement measures as follows:
• Installation of nest-boxes within the golf course or other land as supported by Council;
• Salvage of any “habitat” material (hollows/dead wood/logs) for use elsewhere in the landscape;
• A protective mechanism (e.g. covenant) if Council considers this necessary, for the retained
vegetation in the north generally consistent with Area 2 (Attachment B); and
• Reconfirming that a rehabilitation/landscaping plan would ensure the control of invasive weed
species 7 and planting with suitable native alternatives. This will enhance local habitat values.
These are all measures that I would expect could be a condition of approval and reasonably imposed in the
circumstances.
Please do not hesitate to give me a call on 0407 410 099 if you need to discuss further.
Kind regards
Justin Watson (PhD; CEnvP.)
Director/Principal Ecologist
Gondwana Ecology Group
Encl.
ATTACHMENT B – Updated Development Layout (February 2023)
ATTACHMENT A – Tree Survey Results and Figure 1 – Survey Areas
7 Noting the weed understorey associated with the vegetation on the subject land.
4
[OCR of page images]
| would also recommend additional ecological enhancement measures as follows:
e Installation of nest-boxes within the golf course or other land as supported by Council;
e Salvage of any “habitat” material (hollows/dead wood/logs) for use elsewhere in the landscape;
e A protective mechanism (e.g. covenant) if Council considers this necessary, for the retained
vegetation in the north generally consistent with Area 2 (Attachment B); and
e Reconfirming that a rehabilitation/landscaping plan would ensure the control of invasive weed
species’ and planting with suitable native alternatives. This will enhance local habitat values.
These are all measures that | would expect could be a condition of approval and reasonably imposed in the
circumstances.
Please do not hesitate to give me a call on 0407 410 099 if you need to discuss further.
Kind regards
Justin Watson (PhD; CEnvP.)
Director/Principal Ecologist
Gondwana Ecology Group
Encl.
ATTACHMENT B - Updated Development Layout (February 2023)
ATTACHMENT A - Tree Survey Results and Figure 1 — Survey Areas
7 Noting the weed understorey associated with the vegetation on the subject land.
Page 5
NDWa, SIN, 6 G3) e S Ras? ATTACHMENT A — UPDATED DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT
Page 6
LEGEND
1 NEW HOTEL
2 POOL
3 NEW HOTEL ENTRY ROOF
4 TENNIS COURT WITH EXISTING ON-GRADE CAR PARK
BELOW
5 TENNIS PAVILION
6 AMENITIES
7 LINKS DRIVE
8 RESORT DRIVE
9 EXISTING COUNTRY CLUB
10 EXISTING DAY SPA & GYMNASIUM
11 EXISTING POOL
12 FIRE PIT
13 NEW 2 LEVEL CARPARK WITH EXISTING LOWER CAR
PARK BELOW
14 EXISTING MID CAR PARK
15 EXISTING UPPER CAR PARK
16 EXISTING PORTE-COCHERE
1
17 EXISTING PORTE-COCHERE ROOF
DA3.03 18 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PORTE COCHERE
HATCH ZONE INDICATES MSES
FROM MID CAR PARK
1 ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES
19 NEW PORTE COCHERE ROOF
DA3.01 GREEN DASH INDICATES 20 EXISTING PORTE COCHERE ROOF EXTENSION
DA4.03
AREA OF BIODIVERSITY 21 SERVICE ACCESS TO POOL PLANT + WATER TANKS
SIGNIFICANCE 22 PLATEAU
23 SERVICE ROAD WAY EXTENSION
1 24 EXISTING SERVICE LANEWAY
2 25 EXISTING LOADING BAY
33 DA3.03 26 EXISTING SITE ACCESS
27 EXISTING MANHOLE AT PORTE-COCHERE LEVEL
8 28 EXISTING BUGGY PARKING
8305
29 EXISTING BUS PARKING
0
753
30 EXISTING BRIDGE CONNECTION
31 POOL PLANT BELOW
DA4.02 2 32 TENNIS COURT SHADE STRUCTURE
19 X CARPARKS
34 WITH SEATING BELOW
33 CONTROLLED GATE TO OVERFLOW CARPARKING
2.5 OU CONTOUR
34 REINFORCED TURF OVERFLOW CARPARKING / MULTI-
40
PURPOSE SPACE.
40
35 PEDESTRIAL ACCESS TO CLUBHOUSE
36 JACUZZI
37 68,000 LITRE WATER TANK BELOW
450 1 38 SOLAR PANEL CARPORT ROOFS
0
CLE 37
AR
40 2.5 OU CONTOUR
1 SITE BOUNDARY
1 EXISTING EASEMENT
2 DA3.03
2 EXISTING SEWER LINE
6 23 MSES ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES
450 2 AREA OF BIODIVERSITY SIGNIFICANCE
0 1 1 DA3.03
CLE
AR
2 1 1
DA3.02 DA3.02
SERVICE ROAD TO BE A
22 34 MINIMUM 3.5m WIDE
DA4.03 2 1
2 19 x CARPARKS
36 (INCLUDES 4xPWD) 33
4500
CLE 2
AR
0
12
350
2
DA3.02 1
3 2 37
DA2.04 DA2.04
31
21 11
SERVICE ROAD TO BE A
32 MINIMUM 3.5m WIDE
DA2.03 6
DA4.02 1 10
4 4 1 28
24
15
5
3
20
30
6 35
3 4
19 27
4 4 2
14
32 DA4.02 DA4.02 DA3.02
18
26
3 2
25
DA2.04 DA2.04
17
26
7 DA2.03 16 9
1
1
29 DA3.01
3 DA2.03
DA2.03 4 38
13
38
2
PORTE COCHERE TO BE RENOVATED TO
ENSURE 4.3M HEIGHT CLEARANCE FOR
DA2.03 VEHICLE ACCESS
IMPORTANT NOTES: REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION BY CLIENT DRAWING TITLE
1 04/09/20 FOR INFORMATION ST
Do not scale from drawings. All dimensions to be checked
on site before commencement of work. All discrepancies to 2
3
22/09/20
25/09/20
FOR INFORMATION
DA APPROVAL
ST
ST
NOOSA SPRINGS REAL ESTATE PTY SITE PLAN
be brought to the attention of the Architect. Larger scale
drawings and written dimensions take preference. This 4
drawing is copyright and the property of the author, and must 5
09/10/20
14/10/20
DA APPROVAL REVISED
DA APPROVAL REVISED
ST
ST
LTD
not be retained, copied or used without the express authority 6 04/11/20 COUNCIL PRESENTATION ST
Marchese Partners International Pty Ltd
of MARCHESE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL PTY. LTD. 7 01/12/20 DA APPROVAL REVISED ST Level 14, 46 Edward Street. Brisbane, QLD 4000. Australia
8 19/10/21 CARPARK DESIGN ST P +61 7 3211 2600 F +61 7 3211 0297 E [email protected] PROJECT SCALE DATE DRAWN CHECKED
9 12/11/21 RFI ST
www.marchesepartners.com 1 : 500 @A1
10 04/03/22 DA REVISED DESIGN ST
NOOSA SPRINGS BOUTIQUE HOTEL 09/02/23 AB BY
FOR APPROVAL 11
12
13
13/04/22
21/04/22
09/02/23
REVISED DESIGN
UPDATED DA DRAW INGS
UPDATED DA DRAW INGS
BY
BY
LC
Sydney · Brisbane· Melbourne · Adelaide
Kuala Lumpur · Auckland · Christchurch · London · Madrid JOB DRAWING REVISION
ABN 33 590 578 323 0 5 10 20
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20079 DA1.00 13
[OCR of page images]
LEGEND
41 NEW HOTEL
2 POOL
3 NEW HOTEL ENTRY ROOF
4 TENNIS COURT WITH EXISTING ON-GRADE CAR PARK
BELOW
5 TENNIS PAVILION
6 AMENITIES
7 LINKS DRIVE
8 RESORT DRIVE
9 EXISTING COUNTRY CLUB
10 EXISTING DAY SPA & GYMNASIUM
11 EXISTING POOL
42 FIRE PIT
13 NEW 2 LEVEL CARPARK WITH EXISTING LOWER CAR
PARK BELOW
14 EXISTING MID CAR PARK
15 EXISTING UPPER CAR PARK
s : \ é ao 16 EXISTING PORTE-COCHERE
RRR RK LK 17 EXISTING PORTE-COCHERE ROOF
-, - | MATCH ZONE INDICATES USES 18 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PORTE COCHERE
FROM MID CAR PARK
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES 19 NEW PORTE COCHERE ROOF
(____ GREEN DASH INDICATES 20 EXISTING PORTE COCHERE ROOF EXTENSION
AREA OF BIODIVERSITY 21 SERVICE ACCESS TO POOL PLANT + WATER TANKS
SIGNIFICANCE 22 PLATEAU
23 SERVICE ROAD WAY EXTENSION
24 EXISTING SERVICE LANEWAY
25 EXISTING LOADING BAY
26 EXISTING SITE ACCESS
27 EXISTING MANHOLE AT PORTE-COCHERE LEVEL
28 EXISTING BUGGY PARKING
29 EXISTING BUS PARKING
30 EXISTING BRIDGE CONNECTION
be 31 POOL PLANT BELOW
DA4.0f> 2 32 TENNIS COURT SHADE STRUCTURE
19 X CARPARKS / 34 << WITH SEATING BELOW
33 CONTROLLED GATE TO OVERFLOW CARPARKING
See eon : 34 REINFORCED TURF OVERFLOW CARPARKING / MULTI-
oD PURPOSE SPACE.
35 PEDESTRIAL ACCESS TO CLUBHOUSE
36 JACUZZI
37 68,000 LITRE WATER TANK BELOW
38 SOLAR PANEL CARPORT ROOFS
i
i
— — 2.5 0U CONTOUR
-——- SITE BOUNDARY
— —— EXISTING EASEMENT
———— EXISTING SEWER LINE
£77] MSES ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES
r=5"7 AREA OF BIODIVERSITY SIGNIFICANCE
: SERVICE ROAD TO BEA
34 MINIMUM 3.5m WIDE
19 x CARPARKS
(INCLUDES 4xPWD)
SERVICE ROAD TO BEA
MINIMUM 3.5m WIDE
PORTE COCHERE TO BE RENOVATED TO
ENSURE 4.3M HEIGHT CLEARANCE FOR
VEHICLE ACCESS
IMPORTANT NOTES: REVISION |DATE [DESCRIPTION CLIENT DRAWING TITLE
1 04/09/20 FOR INFORMATION
Do ot sel rom arwings Al menses te checket, pia) FORFORMATION NOOSA SPRINGS REAL ESTATE PTY — SITE PLAN
be brought to the attention of the Architect. Larger scale 3 25/09/20 DA APPROVAL LTD
drawings and written dimensions take preference. This 4 09/10/20 DAAPPROVAL REVISED
drawing is copyright and the property of the author, and must|5 14/10/20 DA APPROVAL REVISED .
not be retained, copied or used without the express authority |6 04/11/20 | COUNCIL PRESENTATION Marchese Partners International Pty Ltd ,
of MARCHESE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL PTY. LTD. |7 01/12/20 DA APPROVAL REVISED Level 14, 46 Edward Street. Brisbane, QLD 4000. Australia
8 19/10/21 CARPARK DESIGN P +61 7 3211 2600 F +617 32110297 E [email protected] PROJECT SCALE DATE CHECKED
° taiii21 RF www.marchesepartners.com 1: 500 @A1
FOR APPROVAL" Suz mucosa G STRALI sydney Brisbane: Melbourne - Adelaide NOOSA SPRINGS BOUTIQUE HOTEL 09/02/23 BY
21/04/22 UPDATED DA DRAWINGS H A { J A A Kuala Lumpur - Auckland - Christchurch - London - Madrid JOB DRAWING REVISION
13 09/02/23 UPDATED DA DRAWINGS ABN 33 590 578 323 DA1 00 1 3
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20079
Page 7
ATTACHMENT B – TREE SURVEY
Refer Figure 1 for Area reference (Note: Area 2B = now retained)
1. SITE (INSIDE FENCE)
AREA 1
RETAIN {1A} REMOVE {1B}
TREE
Brushbox 25 14
Gum (red gum/hybrid/ash) 2 -
Tallowwood 1 -
She-oak 2 2
Cypress 11 12
Bloodwood 5 4
Lily pilly (planted/around tennis courts and hut) 2
Banksia 3 1
Palm (planted/around tennis courts and hut) 8 3
Fig 1 -
AREA 2
RETAIN {2A} RETAIN {2B}
TREE
Brushbox 24 23
Gum (red gum/hybrid/ash) 7 2
Tallowwood 4 -
She-oak 7 1
Cypress 14 26
Bloodwood 7 6
Lily pilly (planted) - 1
Banksia 2 -
Wattle 4 7
Palm (planted north of courts) - 16
Macaranga 1 -
AREA 3
RETAIN {3A} REMOVE {3B}
TREE
Brushbox 35 33
She-oak 3 2
Cypress 5 19
Bloodwood 9 6
Banksia 1 1
Wattle 4 2
AREA 4
RETAIN {4A} REMOVE {4B}
TREE
Brushbox 6 4
Bloodwood (hybrid landscape sp.) 1 -
She-oak 6 3
Cypress 6 3
Bloodwood 2 2
Fig (large near tennis hut) - 2
Lily pilly (planted south of courts) - 4
Wattle 3 2
Palm (planted north of courts) - 4
6
[OCR of page images]
ATTACHMENT B — TREE SURVEY
Refer Figure 1 for Area reference (Note: Area 2B = now retained)
1. SITE (INSIDE FENCE)
AREA 1
TREE RETAIN {1A} REMOVE {1B}
Brushbox 25 14
Gum (red gum/hybrid/ash) 2 -
Tallowwood 1 -
She-oak 2 2
Cypress 11 12
Bloodwood 5 4
Lily pilly (planted/around tennis courts and hut) 2
Banksia 3 1
Palm (planted/around tennis courts and hut) 8 3
Fig 1 -
AREA 2
TREE RETAIN {2A} RETAIN {2B}
Brushbox 24 23
Gum (red gum/hybrid/ash) 7 2
Tallowwood 4 -
She-oak 7 1
Cypress 14 26
Bloodwood 7 6
Lily pilly (planted) - 1
Banksia 2 -
Wattle 4 7
Palm (planted north of courts) 16
Macaranga -
AREA 3
TREE RETAIN {3A} REMOVE {3B}
Brushbox 35 33
She-oak 3 2
Cypress 5 19
Bloodwood 9 6
Banksia 1 1
Wattle 4 2
AREA 4
TREE RETAIN {4A} REMOVE {4B}
Brushbox 6 4
Bloodwood (hybrid landscape sp.) 1 -
She-oak 6 3
Cypress 6 3
Bloodwood 2 2
Fig (large near tennis hut) - 2
Lily pilly (planted south of courts) - 4
Wattle 2
Palm (planted north of courts) - 4
Page 8
2. TOTAL SUMMARY (INSIDE SITE)
TREE RETAIN REMOVE
Brushbox 113 51*
Gum 11 0
Cypress 62 38
Wattle 18 4
Bloodwood 29 12*
She-oak 19 7
Banksia 6 2
Note = 63 koala habitat trees removed
3. SHEOAK BREAKDOWN - SUMMARY
Inside Fence
AREA CONES? RETAIN REMOVE
1 YES 1
NO 1 2
2 YES 3
NO 5
3 YES 1
NO 2 2
4 YES 3 3
NO 3
19 (8 with cones) 7 (3 with cones)
Outside Fence {ALL RETAIN}
• Area 2C: 1 x no cones
• Area 2D: 5 x cone, 3 x no cones
4. TOTAL OUTSIDE SITE {ALL RETAIN}
TREE AREA 2C AREA 2D
Brushbox 5 9
She-oak 1 8
Cypress 12 2
Bloodwood 1 4
Wattle 3 1
Gum 2
• Plus – verge road in north: hybrid bloodwood x 1, bloodwood x 1, gum x 1, lily pilly, tuckeroo
• Plus – verge road east/south: wattle x 1, bloodwood x 1, cypress x 1, brushbox x 1
REFER FIGURE 1 overleaf:
• Areas “1-4 A” (yellow = trees retained)
• Areas “1-4 B” (red = trees removed)
• Areas “2 C & D” (green = trees retained)
• Areas “2 A & B” (yellow = trees retained)
7
[OCR of page images]
2. TOTAL SUMMARY (INSIDE SITE)
TREE RETAIN REMOVE
Brushbox 113 51*
Gum 11 0
Cypress 62 38
Wattle 18 4
Bloodwood 29 12*
She-oak 19 7
Banksia 6 2
Note = 63 koala habitat trees removed
3. SHEOAK BREAKDOWN - SUMMARY
Inside Fence
AREA CONES? RETAIN REMOVE
1 YES 1
NO 1 2
2 YES 3
NO 5
3 YES 1
NO 2 2
4 YES 3 3
NO 3
19 (8 with cones) 7 (3 with cones)
Outside Fence {ALL RETAIN}
e Area 2C: 1x no cones
e Area2D:5 x cone, 3 x no cones
4. TOTAL OUTSIDE SITE {ALL RETAIN}
TREE AREA 2C AREA 2D
Brushbox 5 9
She-oak 1 8
Cypress 12 2
Bloodwood 1 4
Wattle 3 1
Gum 2
e Plus — verge road in north: hybrid bloodwood x 1, bloodwood x 1, gum x 1, lily pilly, tuckeroo
e Plus — verge road east/south: wattle x 1, bloodwood x 1, cypress x 1, brushbox x 1
REFER FIGURE 1 overleaf:
e Areas “1-4 A” (yellow = trees retained)
e Areas “1-4 B” (red = trees removed)
e Areas “2 C & D” (green = trees retained)
e Areas “2 A & B” (yellow = trees retained)
Page 9
2C
2A
2D
2B
3B
1A
3A
1B 4A
4B
FIGURE 1. Survey Areas with Trees Retained (yellow or green) vs Removed (red) identified (Note – all areas indicative only)
8
[OCR of page images]
FIGURE 1. Survey Areas with Trees Retained (yellow or green) vs Removed (red) identified (Note — all areas indicative only)