2018-04-19 Ordinary Meeting Agenda

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                              19 APRIL 2018


6    CONSIDERATION OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS


PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
10 APRIL 2018 - Crs Brian Stockwell (Chair), Jess Glasgow, Ingrid Jackson and
Tony Wellington
Other Councillors in attendance: Nil.

1    PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO. 456/2018 - REFUSAL OF
     DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT AT 2 DAVID LOW WAY,
     CASTAWAYS BEACH
     That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the Planning &
     Environment Committee Meeting dated 10 April 2018 regarding Planning & Environment
     Court Appeal No. 456/2018 and agree to defend the appeal.


2    PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO. D30 OF 2018 - NEGOTIATED
     DECISION NOTICE FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT AT 29 & 35A TAIT ST & 30 EAGLE
     DVE, TEWANTIN
     That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the Planning &
     Environment Committee Meeting dated 10 April 2018 regarding Planning & Environment
     Court Appeal No. D30 of 2018 and agree to defend the appeal.


3    RAL17/0504 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT (1 LOT
     INTO 4 LOTS) AT 135 LAKE WEYBA DRIVE, NOOSAVILLE
     That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment
     Committee Meeting dated 10 April 2018 regarding Application No. RAL17/0504 for a
     Development Permit for Reconfiguring of a Lot (1 Lot into 4 Lots) situated at 135 Lake Weyba
     Dr Noosaville and:
     A.    Refuse the application for the following reasons:
           1.    The proposed development does not demonstrate compliance with the Natural
                 Hazards Overlay Code as it comprises the safety of people and property from
                 the site’s residual flood and bushfire risks.
           2.    The proposed development is contrary to the Natural Hazards Overlay Code and
                 Reconfiguring a Lot Code as the proposed lots are located within a flood hazard
                 area and the proposal seeks to fill the site to in an attempt to make it suitable for
                 the development.
           3.    There is no effective evacuation route that remains passible, with sufficient flood
                 warning time, to enable people to progressively evacuate from the site or an area
                 that allows for safe congregation and refuge during a probable maximum flood.
           4.    The proposed development is likely to further burden disaster management
                 response and capacity during flood events.
           5.    The proposed lots are located on land that is subject to bushfire hazard and the
                 proposed development relies on inappropriate bushfire mitigation measures to
                 maintain the safety of people and property.




                                                                                       Page 5 of 14