Council archive · source document
05. Town Planning Report · MCU10/2127
From the archive MCU10/2127 Development Application part 2 of 2 Plans 5 Morwong Drive Noosa Heads. File date in the archive: 2010-12-20 09:49.
Very large file (41.9 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
VIRIDIAN NOOSA - PROPOSAL REPORT
(c) if the assessment manager is not a local government—the laws that
are administered by, and the policies that are reasonably identifiable
as policies applied by, the assessment manager and that are relevant
to the application;
(d) State planning policies, to the extent the policies are not identified
in—
(i) any relevant regional plan as being appropriately reflected in
the regional plan; or
(ii) the planning scheme as being appropriately reflected in the
planning scheme;
(e) a structure plan;
(f) for development in a declared master planned area—all master plans
for the area;
(g) a temporary local planning instrument;
(h) a preliminary approval to which section 242 applies;
(i) a planning scheme;
(j) for development not in a planning scheme area—any planning
scheme or temporary local planning instrument for a planning
scheme area that may be materially affected by the development;
(k) if the assessment manager is an infrastructure provider—the priority
infrastructure plan.
(3) In addition to the matters or things against which the assessment manager
must assess the application under subsection (2), the assessment manager
must assess the part of the application having regard to the following—
(a) the common material;
(b) any development approval for, and any lawful use of, premises the
subject of the application or adjacent premises;
(c) any referral agency’s response for the application.”
According to Section 326 of the SPA:
“(1) The assessment manager’s decision must not conflict with a relevant
instrument unless—
(a) the conflict is necessary to ensure the decision complies with a State
planning regulatory provision; or
(b) there are sufficient grounds to justify the decision, despite the
conflict; or
(c) the conflict arises because of a conflict between—
(i) 2 or more relevant instruments of the same type, and the
decision best achieves the purposes of the instruments; or
HUMPHREYS REYNOLDS PERKINS PLANNING CONSULTANTS 19
20-Dec-10 - 10BR087.R01.010.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
05. Town Planning Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 41.9 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.