Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Jill Phyland
4. Confirm that the following mandatory supporting Inlormatlon accompanies this application
Mandalory supp<>rting information Conn""atlon of Method of
lodgement lodgemont
All applications
A >lie plan drawn to an aP!¥Opriate seale (1:100. 1 :200 or 1 :500 are g.eonfirmed
recommendod salles) which sIlows the I_ng:
• the locaUon .nd s~e area of !he land to which the eppflClltlO<l ralales
(reie""nt lanet)
• lhe north point
• the boundaries of !he relevanlland
• any roed fronlages olth. lllIevant l.nd. including tile name of the mad
• the location .nd uoe DC any existing or proposed Widing. or strucIure •
on the relevant land (note: where extensive demoUtion or new lxJjdjng.
are proposed. t.Yo s.pamte pians (an existing site plan and flI'lIlosed SIte
plonl may be appropriate)
• any existing Of PIOPOsed easements on tn. relevant I.nd and \/leir
lunttlOll
• the location and ••••• of building. on land adjoining the relevanlland
• all vehicle access points and ""y existing or proposed ear partdng •••••
on the relevant land. Car parking spaces lor pe1SOI1Swllh disabilnies and
any •• ",iee vehicle acress and parking ohould be c1ea~y marl<ed
• lor any new building on lb. retevant I.nd.lheloeatlon 01 refuse $1orogo
• the location of any proposed relaining wall. on the lllIevanlland
helghl .
and melr
I
• the location 01 any propos«llandscaping on the rel~vantlarni . I
• th81ocatlon 01 any stormwaler detenllon on the relevant land . I
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the onsite parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
i When the application involves new operational work
Plans shOMlg tM nature. I,"",tlon. number of new o"",,Ie car parking beys. .I2fConfirmed
proposed ."'. 01 new "'ndscaping. proposed type 01 new vehicle cross-over
(noo-re$idOO1ial useS), proposed maximum new vahl",,' •• sefVldng
o Nol appllca~e
arrangement (llO/I-reskJentlal uses) of the proposoo fleW operational ••••rI<.
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
requirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint proposed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
7.5m x 5o4m (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
•
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Jill PhylandRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.