Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

Minor Change Report 51988 2740 02 [As Published] · 51988.2740.02

of 8

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

               •      where the original application was code assessable, the change would not cause the
                      application to become impact assessable.
               3.3. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
               The following codes from the Noosa Plan 2020 are applicable to this development:
               •      Medium Density Residential Zone Code;
               •      Coastal Communities Local Plan Code;
               •      Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code;
               •      Works Codes.
               The proposed change increases the development’s total gross floor area and site cover and
               intrudes into the 6m rear setback.
               The existing development has a plot ratio of 0.34:1 and a site cover of 24.5%. The proposed
               changes will increase the plot ratio to 0.39:1 and site cover to 31.3%. The proposed changes
               remain consistent with the Noosa Plan 2020 maximum requirements for plot ratio of 0.4:1 and
               site cover of 40%.
               In terms of the rear setback the proposed new bedroom is located within the 6m rear setback
               being 3 metres from the rear boundary.
               The applicant submits in support of the proposed rear setback that:
               •    The adjoining rear property (16 Solway Drive) features a structure within 6m of the rear
                    boundary setback and so the proposed 3m rear setback is not inconsistent with development
                    in the Medium Density Residential zone.
               •    The proposed 3m rear setback is 3.073m in external length, 16.2% of the boundary length,
                    and does not feature windows in the rear so creates minimal impact to the rear neighbour in
                    terms of shading or privacy impacts.
               •    There is an exiting pergola in a similar place and size to the proposal, and so the change is
                    extremely minor.
               •    The backyard is currently heavily landscaped which provides a dense vegetated buffer
                    between the site and the adjoining residential properties.




                                                                                                       Page 5 of 8

Document Set ID: 22462205
Version: 6, Version Date: 10/11/2023

Used in these records

About this file

File size
7.9 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Minor Change Report 51988 2740 02 [As Published].pdf · 7.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.