Council archive · source document
Not Properly Made Submission (late, support) - Luna Creamer - MCU12/0012
..
SCRC CORRESPONDENCE
f
ft
11~’!’9,!111 ~
Sunshine Coast Council (;;M ~.
9 Pelican St
Tewantin Qld. 4560
1 July 2012
RE.: MCU12/0012 NOISE ASSESSMENT OF
I today witnessed a basic noise test to determine the drop in dB(A)from the r
training track at 298 Tablelands Road and the residence at 374 Tablelands Roa .
I am aware of the professional Noise Level Assessment done by David Moore &
Associates and confirm that I agree with his findings in this report after witnessing the
practical test done today.
A background noise level was recorded for a period of 20 minutes with the lowest
possible noise level of29.8dB(A)recorded. I believe this to be the lowest possible
noise level for the area during daylight hours on any day or any time ofthe year. The
average for this period was 36.2dB(A)
A "Kymco MXU 300" quad bike was ridden on the proposed training track of298
Tablelands Road, by an inexperienced rider. The bike was governed so as not to
a distance of 10 meters from the
exceed 3500rpm. The noise level was
meas’J~4 from
track with the average noise level 59.4 dB(A).
calculate~ ~f
no~se using "a"tractor, pr?~R ~g.a constant
’I)~,~ ,O ;,
We then generated a motor a
75dB(A)measured at a 10m distance on th~li9Posed quad b~e trammg area of298
Tablelands Road. This noise tested ov
.
of 10 Ill vtes with the lowest
72~ : R’,’eriOd
w~
recorded sound level never falling below
. ’.
(A).
~
-
:
,:;1,
I ,.,’1.
"
i’!
With no change to this generated noise. Plr l from
measured the lowest recorded noise
en
the southern external of
over a period of 1 0minutes, located o~,Pl_$ter comer
the house at 374 Tablelands Road, clS1~f<~~}to the noise source. The lowest re orded
noise level
w~ 31dB(A).
The
temP1.f~~e.
was 18
de~rees Cel~ius with the wind
never exceedmg 2 knots from
the,~~,t durmg penod oftestmg.
the
(’
This test clearly shows the practicality of the effect of both terrain and vegetation
impacting on noise reduction. It proves that the estimates in the David Moore report
are correct. It is a known fact that vegetation does have an im ac oise-r~4l:let
and this simple test proves it.
I Counter
Deve’iopme:)~’tt ~
I
- 2 JUL 1012
.,..cont g2....... Tewantin
Go< ~Q~6, "i..a.",,]
~,
/1 e;~ r
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
’\
..
.
Page 2
I can assure Council there will be no impact from the noise generated by this
proposed tour business. I have based this on both a practical test done with Charles
Marais as well as a test ofthe proposed quad bikes to be used.
Surely Council must see that this whole questioning ofthe noise report is just another
attack against the proposal from a joint effort ofthe Fowler/Schofield campaign. To
date the Fowler/Schofield attack has been pointed to every possible part of the
proposed business and has clearly cost Charles Marais way too much in defending the
claims and the delays in starting this highly supported tourism business.
I trust Council will take my confirmation of the sound testing seriously and approve
this application for a material change of use without any further delays.
Yours truly,
Signed: L2
Name: I&wt ~~
Used in these records
Not Properly Made Submission (late, support) - Luna Creamer - MCU12/0012Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 900 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.