Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

Decision Notice - Change to an Existing Approval - 010.2006.00000823.003 [As Published] · 132006.823.03

of 59

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

    2006/823




Page 57 of 59


[OCR of page images]
2006/823

 

 

Council Application Number: 2006/8623
EPA Application Number: 27809 Past 10

Conditions of the development approval

1) Sufficient information to be provided in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act
1994 and the Draft Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Contaminated
Land in Queensland (DEH, 1998) to show that Lot 106 on SP151408 is suitable for the
intended use. .

2) Third Party Reviewer. A Third Party Reviewer (TPR) must be appointed under the EPA's
Terms of Reference - Use of a Third Party Reviewer for Assessment and Management of
Site Contamination dated 28 August 2003 (TOR). The TPR must:

i) review all site assessment and remediation work undertaken to date on the whole
of Lot 106 SP151408;

ii) approve a remediation plan for removal and validation of all site contamination that
is prepared by consultants with relevant qualifications and experience as required
in Sections 381 and.395 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994, and.

iti) certify that the whole of Lot 106 SP151408 is suitable for any use and can be
removed from the Environmental Management Register or is suitable for the
intended residential uses subject to the conditions of a draft Site Management Plan.

3) Prior to any construction or development works commencing in the area of “containment
cell" on the subject land, the TPR certification must be provided to the Environmental
Protection Agency.

Reasons for inclusion of development conditions or refusal

In accordance with section 3.3.18 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and section 27B of the
Acts interpretation Act 1954, a concurrence response must include reasons for a refusal or for
the inclusion of development conditions.

The Environmental Protection Agency is recognised as a concurrence agency under the
Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 for the protection of the environment by the management
of contaminated land. The Environmental Protection Agency concurrence agency conditions
for this proposed development that are contained within this response are required to prevent
or mitigate any potential risk to human health or the environment from possible hazardous
contaminants present on the site.

Additional information for applicants

This concurrence response pursuant to Chapter 7, Part 8 of the Environmental Protection Act
1994 applies only to contaminated land issues and does not remove the need to obtain any
further approval for this development which may he required by this or other legislation, State

and/or Commonwealth. Applicants are advised to check with all relevant statutory authorities
for such approvals as may be required.

~ End of Concurrence Agency Response ~

Pave of

Page 57 of 59

Used in these records

About this file

File size
329 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Decision Notice - Change to an Existing Approval - 010.2006.00000823.003 [As Published].pdf · 329 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.