Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

Concurrence Agency Response OPW12/0287

of 10
EHP Permit number: SPCC0486912

 

in this development approval as to the scale, intensity or manner of carrying out of the Activity, then such
conditions prevail to the extent of the inconsistency.

This development approval authorises the Activity. It does not authorise environmental harm unless a
concurrence agency condition within this development approval explicitly authorises that harm. Where there is
no condition, or the development approval is silent on a matter, the lack of a condition or silence shall not be
construed as authorising harmAs part of the concurrence agency response the following development
conditions are to be attached to the development approval:

Delegate

Ben Sale

Delegate, Chief Executive administering the Coastal Protection
and Management Act 1995.

Department of Environment and Heritage Protection

14 November 2012

Page 2 of 3« 120607 «Version 1

 

Department of Environment and Heritage Protection

Log in to download the original (Concurrence Agency Response OPW12_0287.msg)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.