Council archive · source document
Development Application part 3 of 10 Planning Report - MCU13/0092
Very large file (41.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
.
~~
..JtJrli{,lIJiI
1NltGItn’V- .StJ(CESS
are sensitively managed and protected from any
adverse impacts Including cumulative impacts, resulting
from development;
ii set Noosa Shire apart from other coastal parts of south-
eas Queensland by strongly protecting the natural
environment;
iii support the economy through the tourism industry;
iv define the boundaries to or of each of the distinct urban
localities of the shire;
v protect water quality, landscape stability and
biodiversity;
vi provide passive, nature-based recreational and
education opportunities;
vii enhance visual amenity; and
viii provide linkages beyond the Shire’s boundaries"
Town Planning Comments:
In our opinion the proposal is consistent with the DEO. More specifically, the
proposal:
. will incorporate water quality and quantity management elements
which will ensure that there are no discernible impacts on the
adjoining Noosa National park and wetland areas;
. will introduce landscaping/vegetation elements which will visually
enhance the natural, and man made environment beyond the
-
standard which currently exists, and which has existed for the past
50years;
. will enhance the local economy by arresting considerable escape
expenditure from Peregian Beach, and also assist the tourism industry
by complementing and enhancing the function of the
Neighbourhood Village Centre as a Entertainment/Dining/ Social
meeting Place;
. does not impact on the distinct urban locality of Peregian Beach;
. will incorporate high water quality, landscaping and biodiversity
outcomes;
. will enhance visual amenity by modernising an abandoned relatively
uninteresting site with a contemporary convenience shopping
complex, incorporating built and landscape design outcomes
characteristic of the Peregian Beach idiom;
Finally, it needs to be recognised that the subject site is privately owned, and
consequently the community expectations cannot be the same as that for
similarly zoned land in public ownership.
May 2013 IA MCU IGA Complex at Peregian Page 33
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application part 3 of 10 Planning Report - MCU13/0092Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 41.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.