Original source · versioned page text
Further Advice (17 10) As Published (2)
Attached to the e-mail Further Advice Response 21-8-26 – OPW Application (Council Ref. OPW24/0142) - Lakelands Resort, 396 Lake Cooroibah Road, Cooroibah.
Issue – Earthworks Plan
An Earthworks Plan has not been submitted as part of the application material.
Council is unable to assess the “Earthworks” component of the Operational Works application
against the Noosa Plan 2020 – Earthworks Code.
Council considers the application material insufficient to satisfy Condition 3 of the higher order
approval (51987.2966.05).
Advice Required
3. Submit an Earthworks Plan that satisfies the Noosa Plan 2020 – Earthworks Code,
PSP6 – Engineering Design Standards and demonstrates the extent of earthworks
required below the 3.0m contour to improve the existing drainage in the area. The
Earthworks Plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ).
Issue – Stormwater Management Plan
A Stormwater Management Plan has not been submitted as part of the application material.
Council is unable to assess the “Stormwater” and “Drainage work” components of the
Operational Works application against the Noosa Plan 2020 – Water Quality and Drainage
Code.
Council considers the application material insufficient to satisfy Condition 4 of the higher order
approval (51987.2966.05).
N.B. Council advises that Marshall Civil Engineering’s Stormwater Management Plan (SBSMP, Rev. B)
dated 2 August 2021 is unlikely to satisfy the above because the report does not:
• consider an increase in impervious area from the sealing of the internal driveway;
• include an allowance for climate change when calculating the required detention volume; and
• include a ‘low-flow’ outlet to allow the detention tanks to empty between rainfall events.
Advice Required
4. Submit a Stormwater Management Plan that satisfies the Noosa Plan 2020 – Water
Quality and Drainage Code, PSP6 – Engineering Design Standards and Condition 4 of
the higher order approval (51987.2966.05). The Stormwater Management Plan must be
prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ).
Issue – Driveway Crossover
The proposed driveway crossover shown on SCG Consulting’s Proposed Driveway Crossover
Plan (33140 – OW2.2) dated July 24 does not comply with Council’s standard drawing RS-
056 for the following reasons:
• a culvert, associated headwalls and stone pitching has not been proposed to support
flow and prevent ponding in the existing verge.
• guideposts have not been proposed.
Council considers that the proposed driveway crossover fails to satisfy Condition 5 of the
higher order approval (51987.2966.05).
Advice Required
Page 2 of 5
Document Set ID: 24231086
24231081
Version: 2, Version Date: 17/10/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.