Minor Change Report MCU21/0156.03 [As Published]

                                                    Figure 6 – Covered Area

               In doing so, the applicant also seeks to extend the concrete slab/tiles by 6.7m2. The original
               delegated report included a table summary of the development’s development parameters, with
               the pertinent issues of the proposed minor change relating to the development’s site cover and
               landscaping.
               The original (unsubdivided) parcel of land achieved a total land area of 4,151m2, with maximum
               allowable site coverage of 45%.
               The approved site cover was 41.6% (~1726.8m2), an increase of 21.4m2 increases the
               development’s site cover to 42.1% (~1748.2m2).
               The proposed increase of impervious by 6.7m2 does not result in a noncompliance with the soft
               landscaping requirements.
               The proposed extension does not raise conflict with the density parameters of the scheme.




                                                                                                 Page 9 of 17

Document Set ID: 23405905
Version: 5, Version Date: 25/02/2025


[OCR of page images]
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<4} 6.723m p> 21.43m?
6723,
Q oO o. a]
ae —————————
o
Ll 4-6
4
bio q p
B 8
8 O
bnes
be
| q b
| se A ER oreeeececesenanoroen

 

 

 

 

Figure 6 — Covered Area

In doing so, the applicant also seeks to extend the concrete slab/tiles by 6.7m?. The original
delegated report included a table summary of the development’s development parameters, with
the pertinent issues of the proposed minor change relating to the development’s site cover and
landscaping.

The original (unsubdivided) parcel of land achieved a total land area of 4,151m?, with maximum
allowable site coverage of 45%.

The approved site cover was 41.6% (~1726.8m?), an increase of 21.4m? increases the
development’s site cover to 42.1% (~1748.2m?).

The proposed increase of impervious by 6.7m? does not result in a noncompliance with the soft
landscaping requirements.

The proposed extension does not raise conflict with the density parameters of the scheme.

Page 9 of 17

Document Set ID: 23405905
Version: 5, Version Date: 25/02/2025