Council archive · source document
B 141002 Prelodge Meeting Minutes · 132007.2398
Attached to the e-mail 132007.2398.02 Request to change existing approval (1 of 3) Cover letter and site, floor & elevation plans.
PRE-LODGEMENT NOTES
PRELODGEMENT ADVICE SERVICES
PLANNING ASSESSMENT BRANCH
1. PLM DETAILS
Date 01/10/2014 Application No PLM14/0027
Applicant PALM LAKE WORKS
Applicant Name Title/Organisation
Attendees SUZANNE JENSEN PLANNER, PALM LAKES
ANDREW MCPHAIL BROWN CONSULTING
Council Name Title/Branch
Attendees DENIS WALLACE PLANNING
MARK LEWIS CIVIL ENGINEERING
2. PLANNING SCHEME INFORMATION
Development Type OPW ROL X MCU* BA
Level of Assessment Code X Impact
*Refer to notes regarding considerations for a Permissible Change
Planning Locality Cooroy & Lake Macdonald
Zone Community Services
Overlays Biodiversity Overlay – Watercourses & Drainage Lines
Natural Resources Overlay - Gas Pipeline Buffer
3. PLM PROPOSAL
Street Address 4 LAMONTS RD COOROY QLD 4563
Real Property Description LOT 2 RP 165418
Proposal Details CHANGES TO AN APPROVED RETIREMENT & AGED
CARE DEVELOPMENT
(Use Type, Number of Units/Lots,
Retail GFA, Car Parking, etc)
This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to an
approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
FM6082/8-18/04/2013 Page 1 of 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
PLM Document(s)/Plan(s) Title
Supporting B14158.W-SK01 PALM LAKE CONCEPT LAYOUT
Information PLAN
(Provided by Applicant)
4. ADVICE & INFORMATION
Planning Officer Name – Denis Wallace
The applicant seeks to make amendments to the approved development (known as RSL
Care Cooroy) to reflect its preferred retirement housing and aged care products. An
indicative layout plan was provided.
In regard to whether the proposed amendments to the approved development could be
considered as a permissible change under the Act, the following aspects should be
considered/addressed:
- Population density should remain consistent with the existing approval
- There should be no significant increase in built form with respect to height, site cover,
gross floor area, setbacks or the like
- Possible impacts due to the relocation of the aged care facility to the Pearsons Rd
frontage from traffic, deliveries, heavy vehicle reversing manoeuvres, staff
movements, built form, streetscape and the like on adjacent residents
All residential dwellings were described as 2br + study but with a contractual requirement
for no more than 2 permanent residents.
Detailed plans at application stage should address building envelopes within residential
“lots”, landscaping provision for the site overall, changes required via existing conditions of
approval, pedestrian connectivity through the site to the new bus stop and staging.
The new bowling green facility was described as being for residents only, covered and
with low level lighting. As such, it would not be considered a separate use.
New specialist reports will be required for Noise, Stormwater Management & Treatment
and Traffic.
Council staff are available to meet further or provide feedback prior to application
lodgement to consider detailed plans and/or submissions regarding how the applicant
considers the proposal meets the test for a permissible change under the Act.
Civil Engineering Officer Name - Mark Lewis
The applicant will need to update the reports/plans for Traffic, Stormwater Management
and Treatment to reflect the new proposal and be in accordance with current standards.
It is suggested that the Traffic report:
make comparisons with the previous approval in regard to traffic movements and
access locations
include comment on the proposed access from Pearsons Road and the relationship to
existing intersections.
Main Roads requirements at the intersections of Pearsons Road and Lamonts Road
It is also noted that a truncation of the corner of the site at the intersection of Pearsons
Road and Elm Street is required.
This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to an
approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
FM6082/8-18/04/2013 Page 2 of 3
Page 3
5. INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES
A request for written advice for an Infrastructure Contributions Estimate relevant to your
proposal may be obtained for a fee of $211.
6. FURTHER ADVICE TO BE SOUGHT
You are advised to contact Unitywater and any relevant Queensland Government
Agencies for their specific requirements in respect of your proposal.
7. FOLLOW UP MEETING
Confirmation Email Sent YES X NO
(Highlight Applicable)
8. PLM NOTES
Council Project Director
This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to an
approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
FM6082/8-18/04/2013 Page 3 of 3
Used in these records
B 141002 PRELODGE MEETING MINUTES.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 188 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.