Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

planning report Krimmer - Change · 132004.240120.3

of 15

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

5.0 State assessment and other matters

5.1 State interests
5.1.1 Matters established in the Planning Regulation

Nil

5.1.2 State Planning Policy

The SPP includes assessment benchmarks that may be applicable where a local government
planning scheme does not adequately reflect the SPP. The following assessment benchmarks are
applicable and have been appropriately considered in preparing this development application:

 State interest               Assessment against assessment benchmark
 Coastal Environment          The relevant State Interest seeks for the coastal environment to be
                              protected and enhanced, while supporting opportunities for coastal-
                              dependent development, compatible urban form along the state’s coastal
                              land. The site is within the urban footprint and the development is
                              seaward of the coastal building line.



6.0 Conclusion
This application seeks a minor change to conditions 1 (approved plans) and 50 (southern side
setback) of existing MCU Development Permit 23814 DA. The proposed additional covering of the
existing stairs complies with the definition of a minor change under Schedule 2 of the Planning Act
2016 and is not substantially different development in accordance with Schedule 1 of the DA Rules
2017.

The assessment finds the development meets the relevant Specific and Overall Outcomes of the
Noosa Plan, subject to the following grounds of approval:

      •   The high-quality building and landscaping design enhances the coastal character of the area
          which is sympathetic and does not detrimentally impact the locality;

      •   The setback is consistent with recently approved adjoining developments and does not
          adversely impact upon natural coastal processes; and

      •   The design is sympathetic to the coastal environment protects the visual amenity enjoyed by
          users and others.

The Assessment Manager’s favourable consideration of the above development application is
therefore recommended. Please contact me if you require any further information and/or clarification
with respect to the above application.




                                                                                         Page 15 of 15

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.9 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

planning report Krimmer - Change.pdf · 2.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.