Amended Negotiated Decision Notice RAL20-0021 [As Published]

2010-19147 SRA

Attachment 2—Reasons for referral agency response

 

(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for SARA's decision are:
The development complies with State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment of the
SDAP. Specifically, the development

does not create a safety hazard for users of a state-controlled road

does not compromise the structural integrity of state-controlled roads, road transport infrastructure or
road works

does not result in a worsening of the physical condition or operating performance of state-controlled
roads and the surrounding road network

does not compromise the state's ability to construct, or significantly increase the cost to construct
state-controlled roads and future state-controlled roads

does not compromise the state's ability to maintain and operate state-controlled roads, or
significantly increase the cost to maintain and operate state-controlled roads

does not compromise the structural integrity of public passenger transport infrastructure or
compromise the operating performance of public passenger transport services

avoids significant adverse impacts resulting from environmental emissions generated by vehicles on
the state-controlled road.

Material used in the assessment of the application:

the development application material and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016

Planning Regulation 2017

the SDAP (version 2.6). as published by SARA

the Development Assessment Rules

SARA DA Mapping system.

‘State Assessment and Referral Agency Pages ofS

Document Set ID: 21606483

Version: 1, Version Date: 07/09/2021

Page 15 of 19