Council archive · source document
0014C22C.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
rete) ems ; : column 2 Column 3
Specific Outcomes : Probable solutions (if code assessable) Compliance
ii. increasing flooding, which adversely affects the
safety or use of any land upstream and
downstream; and
ili. adversely affecting the flow of water in any
overland flow path.
Stoping sites and ridgelines
019 Development on sfoping sifes— $19.1 Buildings and associated accessways are not Future Detached Houses able to comply with
a) is responsive to the natural topography of the site and constructed on land with a slope greater than 25% (1 in 4); requirements. Building design steps down site with
minimises cut and fill; AND minimal cut and fill proposed.
b) does not visually dominate the hill slope or interrupt the $19.2 Buildings are of split level design that step down the
skyline; slope or have suspended floor construction;
c) is integrated with the natural site characteristics including AND
vegetation, and $19.3 Cut or fill is less than 1.2m in depth;
d) for Multiple housing, takes the form of small separate AND
buildings; $19.4 The distance between the ground and the lowest part of
AND the floor of the building does not exceed 3m;
AND
020 On sleep slopes or ridgelines which are visible from the $19.5 Buildings present no more than 2 or 3 storeys at any
major road network, areas of public open space, the Noosa River one point.
or the beaches—
@) new buildings and structures including outbuildings, are $20.1 No solution provided
‘designed so as not to dominate or detract from the scenic
and environmental qualities of the site and its setting; and
b) the external colour scheme of buildings is designed to blend
with the natural elements of its surroundings.
Public transport node
a Not applicable
Environmental and cultural heritage values
021 = There are no significant adverse effects on biodiversity, No solution provided Proposal does not impact on values of surrounding area.
native vegetation, habitats, landscape quality, water quality or
cultural heritage values, including those related to—
a) changes to natural drainage;
b) disturbance to any of the wetland systems;
c) management of landslide and fire risk;
d) erosion and the transport of sediments off site;
e} unmanaged public access;
f) changes to fauna habitat and behaviour; and
g) disturbance of buildings and features, including natural
features, of cultural heritage significance.
Open space network
O22 The integrated open space network is established, $23.1 Open space corridors and existing native vegetation in Proposal does not impact on surrounding open space
enhanced and protected throughout the locality to— areas indicated in Schedule 5 — Map 4 are protected from corridors.
@) _ provide for both passive and active recreational pursuits; fragmentation and encroachment by development.
b) _ provide connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists:
Cc) provide access to community uses and buildings, public
open space and recreation areas, the beaches, NoosaSee the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
0014C22C.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
07/0070 - MCU - Boundary Realignment & 2 Detached Houses [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
07/0070 - MCU - Boundary Realignment & 2 Detached Houses [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.