Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses

of 88

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                                                                          LANDSCAPING CODE
                                                                                                                  Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions



                                                        PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                                                     COUNCIL USE
       PERFORMANCE CRITERIA                                                    SOLUTIONS*                    COMMENTS
                                                        (IF CODE ASSESSABLE)                                                                      ONLY
    high pedestrian areas;
(i) in intensively used environments, can
    endure high levels of activity; and
(j) for rural residential developments, are
    best suited to less intensive
    maintenance and low availability of
    water for gardens.
Safety and security
O4 Landscaping is designed and located         S4.1 No solution provided.
to maximise the safety and security of
public and private areas by—
(a) clearly defining the boundaries
    between private and public spaces;
(b) promoting casual surveillance of
    buildings and public areas from the
    street and other public areas for
    personal security reasons;
(c) avoiding concealment spots; and
(d) maintaining safe site distances to and
    from road and building corners,
    carpark entrances and driveways (see
    Figure 14-17);
(e) maintain safe site distances at
    planting bed ends within carparks;
(f) protecting solid fences from graffiti by
    incorporating elements such as
    landscaping, creepers, murals or
    vandal resistant paint; and
(g) separating and defining pedestrian
    and vehicle circulation routes.

Figure 14-16— Landscaping allows for
adequate
safe    vision at  driveways    and
intersections




1     Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
                A/S = Alternative Solution                                                                                                    Cooroy Care Farm
                N/A = Not applicable to this proposal

521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain                                Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008                  Page 3
Log in to download the original file

Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses.pdf · 1.9 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.