Original source · versioned page text
Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
high pedestrian areas;
(i) in intensively used environments, can
endure high levels of activity; and
(j) for rural residential developments, are
best suited to less intensive
maintenance and low availability of
water for gardens.
Safety and security
O4 Landscaping is designed and located S4.1 No solution provided.
to maximise the safety and security of
public and private areas by—
(a) clearly defining the boundaries
between private and public spaces;
(b) promoting casual surveillance of
buildings and public areas from the
street and other public areas for
personal security reasons;
(c) avoiding concealment spots; and
(d) maintaining safe site distances to and
from road and building corners,
carpark entrances and driveways (see
Figure 14-17);
(e) maintain safe site distances at
planting bed ends within carparks;
(f) protecting solid fences from graffiti by
incorporating elements such as
landscaping, creepers, murals or
vandal resistant paint; and
(g) separating and defining pedestrian
and vehicle circulation routes.
Figure 14-16— Landscaping allows for
adequate
safe vision at driveways and
intersections
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
A/S = Alternative Solution Cooroy Care Farm
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.