Original source · versioned page text
Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
(d) providing outdoor areas with seating
for staff and visitors;
(e) adopting landscape solutions that
reduce the visual impact of building
bulk (see Figure 14-23);
(f) using mounding and screen planting
to conceal service and loading areas;
(g) making provision for outdoor dining
areas where appropriate, that
integrate well within the streetscape
(see Figure 14-24);
(h) providing adequate screening along
the perimeters of the development;
(i) avoiding the use of formal planting
design for frontage works; and
(j) providing planting design and species
selection that can endure an
intensively used environment.
Figure 14-23 Landscaping solutions
that appear
to lessen the impact of building bulk
Figure 14-24 Outdoor eating areas
integrate well
with the streetscape
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
A/S = Alternative Solution Cooroy Care Farm
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.