Original source · versioned page text
2018-08-07 S&O Agenda - Att 1 to Item 1 - Draft Bridges Asset Management Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn4. Lifecycle Management Plan
4.1 Assets
Council’s bridges play a vital role in connectivity of the 680km road network (both sealed and
unsealed roads) across the Noosa Shire. There is a total of 56 structures that are made up of
concrete and timber bridges as well as concrete pedestrian underpasses that are considered in this
Asset Management Plan (AMP). A detailed register of these assets is located at Annex B.
The 56 structures include:
• 23 x Timber road bridges
• 28 x concrete road bridges
• 5 x concrete underpasses
4.2 Asset Valuation
The value of the Bridge Assets, at the end of the financial year 2016/2017 for the purposes of this
AMP is summarised below.
May 2018 Current Asset Cost Current Depreciation Written Down Value
Road Bridges $103,604,223 $ 25,168,425 $78,435,798
Table 3: Road Bridges Asset Valuation
4.3 Asset Condition
Levels of service and asset management decision making is directly linked to asset condition; this
determines what condition the asset should be in before an asset management intervention. The
intent of current and future Condition Assessments (CA) is to:
• Provide a robust and repeatable process for carrying out condition assessments on Council’s
bridge assets;
• Use condition assessments to develop programs for intervention with regards to further
inspection, monitoring, maintenance and renewals;
• Provide a basis for information for the modelling of condition data for the likelihood of asset
failure for those assets not inspected.
A consistent condition ranking scale has been chosen by Council as the framework for measuring
bridge assets, based on the 1 to 5 ranking according to the International Infrastructure Management
Manual (IIMM). Any asset scoring 4 (fair) to 5 (poor) will be considered under a renewal program.
Asset Management Plan: Road Bridges Page 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.