Original source · versioned page text
2510-48669 SRA_Response with conditions
Attached to the e-mail MCU25/0092 & OPW25/0143 - SARA Response.
RA6-N SARA reference: 2510-48669 SRA Council reference: MCU25/0092 & OPW25/0143 28 October 2025 Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council [email protected] Attention: Georgina Schramm Dear Ms Schramm SARA referral agency response - 5 Martin St, Peregian Beach (Referral agency response given under chapter 3, part 3, division 1, section 56 of the Planning Act 2016) The development application described below was confirmed as properly referred by the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) on 28 October 2025. Response Outcome: Referral agency response – with conditions Date of response: 28 October 2025 Conditions: The conditions in Attachment 1 must be attached to any development approval Advice: Advice to the applicant is in Attachment 2 Reasons: The reasons for the referral agency response are in Attachment 3 Development details Description: Development Permit Material change of use for dual occupancy (and demolition) Operational works for road work, drainage work, stormwater, earthworks & landscaping South East Queensland (North) regional office Level 4, Foundation Place 3 South Sea Islander Way, Maroochydore Page 1 of 5 PO Box 1129, Maroochydore QLD 4558
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 4 pages
Page 2
2510-48669 SRA
SARA role: Referral agency
SARA trigger: Schedule 10, Part 4, Division 3, Table 1, Item 1 (Planning Regulation
2017)
Premises contaminated because of unexploded ordinance
SARA reference: 2510-48669 SRA
Assessment manager: Noosa Shire Council
Street address: 5 Martin St, Peregian Beach
Real property description: Lot 267 on P93113
Applicant name: DA Bull & JM Bull
C/- Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
Applicant contact details: [email protected]
Human Rights Act 2019 A consideration of the 23 fundamental human rights protected under
considerations: the Humans Right Act 2019 has been undertaken as part of this
decision. It has been determined that this decision does not limit
human rights.
Representations
An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency, at any time before the application is
decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response (chapter 1, part 7, section 30
Development Assessment Rules). Copies of the relevant provisions are in Attachment 4.
A copy of this response has been sent to the applicant for their information.
For further information please contact Rosanna Nobile, Planning Officer, on (07) 5352 9777 or via email
[email protected] who will be pleased to assist.
Yours sincerely
Jamaica Hewston
Manager
cc DA Bull & JM Bull C/- Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd, [email protected]
enc Attachment 1 - Referral agency conditions
Attachment 2 - Advice to the applicant
Attachment 3 - Reasons for early referral agency response
Attachment 4 - Representations about a referral agency response provisions
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 2 of 5
Page 3
2510-48669 SRA
Attachment 1—Referral agency conditions
(Under chapter 3, part 3, division 1, section 56(1)(b)(i) of the Planning Act 2016 the following conditions must be
attached to any development approval relating to this application)
No. Conditions Condition timing
Development Permit: Material change of use
10.4.3.1.1 – Contaminated land (unexploded ordnance) —The chief executive administering the
Planning Act 2016 nominates the Director-General of the Department of State Development,
Infrastructure and Planning to be the enforcement authority for the development to which this
development approval relates for the administration and enforcement of any matter relating to the
following condition:
1. Provide certification to the Department of State Development, Prior to the
Infrastructure and Planning at [email protected] commencement of
by an approved contractor on the Australian Government, works
Department of Defence, Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Panel that
the;
(a) subject site has been remediated and cleared of unexploded
ordnances; or
(b) proposed use can be suitably managed on the site.
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 3 of 5
Page 4
2510-48669 SRA
Attachment 2—Advice to the applicant
General advice
1. Terms and phrases used in this document are defined in the Planning Act 2016, its regulation
or the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) (version 3.3). If a word remains
undefined it has its ordinary meaning.
2. Provide the owner, occupier and any person employed to work on the subject site the following
information:
(a) Residual UXO may still exist following remediation and all work should proceed with
due caution.
(b) The procedure to be followed by any person finding an object suspected of being
explosive ordnance or component thereof:
i. advise the police immediately
ii. do not disturb the object
iii. take action, where appropriate, to prevent it being disturbed by
(c) Another person:
i. note its approximate dimensions and general appearance
ii. note the route to its location.
Applicants wanting to find out more details of area management advice (AMA), current UXO
investigations and remedial search contractors, may use the following websites:
Department of Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation -
https://www.des.qld.gov.au/
Commonwealth Department of Defence - http://www.defence.gov.au/uxo/
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 4 of 5
Page 5
2510-48669 SRA
Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under chapter 3, part 3, division 1, section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)
The reasons for the SARA’s decision are:
The application is for a Development Permit for material change of use - dual occupancy (and
demolition) and operational works – road work, drainage work, stormwater, earthworks & landscaping
at 5 Martin St, Peregian Beach formally described as Lot 267 on P93113.
the proposed development required referral for works located in an area with substantial unexploded
ordnance potential
SARA assessed the development application against State code 13: Unexploded ordnance (State
code 13) of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP), version 3.3.
SARA determined that the application complied with the relevant State code 13, with conditions to
ensure the development:
o does not place another part of the environment, or human health, at risk as a consequence of
development.
Material used in the assessment of the application:
the development application material and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
the SDAP (version 3.3), as published by SARA
the Development Assessment Rules
SARA DA Mapping system
section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019
Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response
provisions
(page left intentionally blank)
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 5 of 5