Original source · versioned page text
Reference Document - MCU26 0012 & OPW26 0034 (As Published)
Considering the existing site conditions (Ref. Section 2), and subject to the implementation of
recommendations given below, it is assessed that there should be a Low Risk of global slope instability
affecting the proposed shed. Regulators (NC) normally require that a Very Low or Low Risk of landslide
affecting the property must be demonstrated to enable development approval.
Summarised in Table 2 is our qualitative assessment of landslide risk for the extensions. A summary of
qualitative terminology for use in assessing risk to property is attached (taken from AGS 2007).
Table 2: Details of Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (AGS 2007)
Assessed
Hazard Likelihood Consequence Comments
Risk
The likelihood of a landslide within the fill or
natural soil materials affecting the proposed
structures is considered Unlikely, given that no
evidence of such slope movement was noted
Landslide extending
on the site or in the immediate vicinity,
through proposed fill
moderate ground slopes (even on the
and/or natural residual Unlikely Medium Low
spur/drainage line flanks, being ≤10°) apparent
soils to cause damage to
lack of groundwater seepage, and that there
the proposed structures
was an opportunity to create favourable
surface water drainage. The consequence of
such instability would be Medium, with the
resultant risk being Low as per AGS 2007.
Given the strength of the deeper residual soils,
limited extent of deeper earthworks filling, and
absence of indicators of slope instability, it is
Deeper landslide (>2 m) considered Rare that a deeper landslide would
through very stiff (or occur extending below the proposed
Rare Major Low
stiffer) residual soils below foundation depths, subject to implementation
the foundation depth of the recommendations in Section 4. Even for
a Major consequence from such instability
there would be a resultant Low risk as per AGS
2007.
4. Recommendations
General recommendations to help maintain the stability of the site are given in the document Some
Guidelines for Hillside Construction, which is attached.
4.1 Extent of Development
The location and nature of the proposed residence, stables and arena (including earthworks) as
described in Section 1.1 shall not be altered unless assessed and approved by Tectonic.
4.2 Earthworks
Future earthworks in building areas are expected to be most significant for the proposed residence,
extending to about 3 m maximum depth of cut and up to about 1.9 m height of fill. Deeper isolated
excavations may be required for footings and underground services.
Any loose or soft soils, saturated silts, organic rich topsoil and severely root affected soils, must be
removed from the proposed construction areas. Following site stripping subgrades should be proof
rolled using a minimum 4 tonne roller in the presence of a civil/geotechnical RPEQ to identify any ‘soft
13 February 2026
26020-001-Rev0 9 of 13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.