Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Submitter Submission and Grounds of Submission Planners’ Response Recommendation
Plan within the proposed Noosa Plan (via the auto electricians and Andrews Auto Mechanical Repairs
carpark at No.15 Factory Street) with a superior route via the drainage easement.
The pedestrian crossing on a state-controlled road would better serve the movement of people travelling on
foot or bicycle to The Majestic Theatre and to the adjacent medical practice, as well as those heading to
the bus stops either side of Factory Street. It would also better serve those travelling on the Noosa Trail
Network, which aligns with the railway station crossing point.
Andrews Mechanical Repairs is not suitable as a pedestrian and bicycle path corridor due to the frequent
movement of cars and trucks there and the requirement that vehicles undergoing service be delivered there
and parked for pick-up. This site, and the activity that occurs there, is not conducive to pedestrian and
bicycle movements.
Restricting the area in which these vehicle movements occur to accommodate a safe pedestrian path
would impact adversely on the business operations currently operating there and would force customers of
Andrews Mechanical Repair to park vehicles in Factory Street (affecting motorists' visibility) or nose-in
against the fence of the railway reserve.
Council support for the drainage easement alignment for the east-west shared pathway at Pomona would
make compelling the case for a pedestrian crossing built at state government (i.e not council) expense.
Pomona would have a strong east—west shared pathway network that would be the lynchpin of a town
active transport network, connecting to the Noosa Trail Network into the adjacent national park and
countryside beyond. (In turn, this supports complementary planning to support hiking and mountain biking
as part of a local eco tourism and nature-based tourism economic strategy.)
Factory Street is a state-controlled road. A raised pedestrian crossing would act as a traffic calming device
on a busy section of road. A defined crossing point would assist safety, as pedestrians would be drawn to
cross at that point, and not elsewhere where visibility is not as good. It would connect the bus stops on
either side of Factory Street.
Based on a similar project at Cooroy funded, by Noosa Council, the new pedestrian crossing would cost
$75,000.
The Principal Bicycle Network at Pomona be altered to maximise the new investment in infrastructure —
both the cross-town path (already funded) and the proposed raised pedestrian crossing over Factory Street
(unfunded at this stage).
The Principal Bicycle Network via Factory Street and Reserve Street, through the Reserve Street level
crossing be not designed for bicycle paths, as is the case currently, given the inappropriate short distance
between the stanchions that support the boom gates. The cost to alter the level crossing to allow for two
traffic lanes and two bike paths two metres wide would be significant.
The better proposition is that the cross-town path and raised pedestrian crossing represents a considerably
cheaper investment that would achieve the same result, while contributing to road safety. QR might be
more conducive to this proposition, as the additional cost to make the Principal Bicycle Network function at
Pomona, across the railway tracks (incorporating the $75,000 pedestrian crossing), would be a cost to
TMR, not QR.
20858479 Opposes proposed footpath adjoining their vehicle service business on 15 Factory Street Pomona site as it Agree that encouraging pedestrians and cyclists along this pathway could potentially present some That the pedestrian/cycle link be amended to go south along factory St and link to main
will impact operations and compromise pedestrian & cyclist safety. Staff are constantly moving cars and health and safety risks. The drainage reserve that is mentioned in the submissions does not formally entrance of Cooroora Creek Park.
20835227 presents a safety issue. Supports alternative pedestrian path from town across railway and through exists on council records and therefore an alternative route south along Factory St to the existing
Council’s drainage reserve off factory Street. entrance is proposed and recommended.
20840899 In Pomona, there are on-road motorcycle parking bays marked out on the bitumen. Mainly these cater to Noted. That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
the out-of-town bikers who come to Pomona every weekend. We don't see areas set aside, and signed as
such, for mobility scooter parking and catering to the ratepayers with genuine need.
There are an estimated 48 people in Pomona reliant on a mobility scooter for their access to town along
shared pedestrian/bicycle paths that are not continuous or not there at all.
A start would be to include in the design of streetscapes at Pomona one or two designated spots where
people can park a mobility scooter they have ridden from home to the shops or to community facilities such
as Pomona and District Community House.
A spot in Joe Bazzo Park, adjacent to Community House would be an ideal location. It is a location where
Noosa Council is about to rip out a barbecue. Don't reinstate it with concrete, or grass, but be imaginative
and convert it into a location where three mobility scooters could park.
20867140 Supports proposed zone change of 61 Pavilion Street from Rural Settlement to part LDR and Part Rural. Noted That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
20820311 Noosa Council's Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP), which informed the new Noosa Plan, There are no plans for a new “sporting complex” at Pomona. That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
includes reference to [at Map 5 (12)] a 'future sports area' at Pomona involving purchase of six hectares of
LGIP Map LGIP-PC-3 Public Parks and Land for Community Facilities identifies the site at Pomona
Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan Page 101
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.