Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Submitter Submission and Grounds of Submission Planners’ Response Recommendation
• Rezoning the proposed Tourist Accommodation areas to Medium Density Residential would be a better
and more appropriate approach to take.
20848346 Long term owner and resident of a unit within “Bedarra” in Munna Crescent Noosaville opposes the Tourist
Accommodation zone as it excludes the use of the property as an owner/occupied residence and
fundamentally change the nature of the area away from the family/village atmosphere to one of high density,
high traffic, high noise zone.
20854156 Owners of units in “Bella Vista” 18 Munna Cres, object to the proposed inclusion of the complex of 6 units in
the Tourist Accommodation zone as:
20854915
• since construction in the 1980’s the units are variously used for long and short-term rental purposes and
20855559 for intermittent and permanent residential purposes.
20866756 • this change completely disregards the area's existing high level of residential amenity
20867455 • it will reduce use rights on the site, even though the existing use rights are interchangeable and are
protected
20865942
• the neighbourhood cannot cope with the additional height and density.
• parking is already at saturation point.
• there is already too much pressure on the small park and beach near Bella Vista.
• the existing sense of community will be lost if the proportion of short stay guests increases.
• as the area is already well settled and existing dwellings will enjoy existing use rights that permit them to
be used for residential (permanent or semi-permanent) or short/long term accommodation purposes; and
the area is not one that is ripe for development or redevelopment such that a new zone could be
expected to find expression any time soon through any new development responding to the new Noosa
Plan it is an exercise in futility
Suggests Medium Density Residential a more appropriate alternative.
20866838 Owner of unit at 106 Noosa Pde, submitter objects to rezoning of property and to the entire New Noosa Plan,
On the basis of retaining the ability to live in it, rent it permanently or Short-term, this is legally an owners
right, not the councils right to dictate based on the location of a property.
• The property was originally built and approved as a residential dwelling and has a mixture of residents,
tenants and tourists in the area, it should not be zoned as one or the other.
• The council has been unable to answer simple questions relating to the consequences of the re-zoning,
therefore an informed decision cannot be made at this stage, as we are unaware of the repercussions of
such a decision.
• Looking at the definitions of zones it suggests we will not be able to reside as permanent residents. This
is unacceptable.
20825905 Owners of both dwellings at 134 Noosa Parade Noosaville rent both properties to local residents on long term Submissions are noted, however given the weight of submissions detailed above and for reasons Council at its Special Meeting of 12 September 2019 resolved that the Noosaville
leases, with the intention to continue this into the future. However support the proposed zoning change to previously outlined about the existing built form and density of the neighbourhood it has been zoning map ZM-12 within Schedule 2.3 of the planning scheme be amended to
Tourist Accommodation because they understood it allows more flexibility into the future while existing use recommended that this portion of Noosaville be changed to medium density residential which is include properties to the north of Noosa Parade, east of Munna Crescent and
rights are protected. more in keeping with the historical zoning of the neighbourhood. including Woorookool Place and Barbados Crescent in the Medium Density
Residential Zone
20847608 No major objections to the Tourist Accommodation zoning (at Woorookool Place) as it’s acceptable use for The properties will continue to have existing use rights for either permanent or visitor occupation.
permanent or holiday letting however would not like tourist levies or changes for unwarranted extra rubbish This formed part of a package of significant changes to the draft scheme re-
removal. advertised from 13 September.
20863974 Operators of Riviera at Noosa 144 Noosa Parade, Noosaville support the proposed rezoning to Tourist During the subsequent consultation period several submissions were received
Accommodation Zone to signify preferred tourist locations in the Shire. requesting the zone be returned to Tourist Accommodation. Refer to Table 17.2
No further changes are recommended.
20867396 Owner of 9 Cloudsley Street requests the site be zoned Medium Density Residential (rather than Low Density In preparing the new scheme Council was conscious of the existence of older duplexes and units That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission
Residential) as it is well-located to support in-fill development and provide housing choice, within walking within Detached Housing areas of Noosaville however the extent of flood hazard in this area is
distance to public transport and existing services and facilities. This in turn would help achieve infill significant and in general it is not sound planning to increase the number of people living in an area
development targets in accordance with the Regional Plan ShapingSEQ. affected by flood hazard. For this reason up zoning of flood hazard areas has been avoided.
20839456 Owner of 32 Creek Rd suggests the site of 658.41m2 is suitable for a development of 4 dwellings with In preparation of the scheme Council did carefully consider lifting the zoning of this area from the That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission
underground parking because it is in close proximity to many different community and medical facilities and Detached Housing to Medium Density Zoning. The greatest concern however was the extent of
service centres and infrastructure is already in place. As the site is proposed to be included in the Low flood hazard in the neighbourhood. Even though this site itself may not be inundated the
Density Residential Zone this would necessitate a higher density zone. neighbourhood is likely to become isolated in a flood event and in general it is not sound planning to
increase the number of people living in an area affected by flood hazard.
20869327 Owner of 30 Lake Weyba Drive considers that given the location of the site close to a Local Centre and other In preparation of the scheme Council did carefully consider lifting the zoning of this area from the That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission
unit and duplex development in the locality the subject site should be rezoned to allow for a duplex or multiple Detached Housing to Medium Density Zoning. The greatest concern however was the extent of
dwelling development. flood hazard in the neighbourhood. The flood hazard overlay does for example extend over the
eastern portion of this site and filling of the site for the purpose of redevelopment is not generally
Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan Page 117
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.