Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report

of 169

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
 Submitter   Submission and Grounds of Submission                                                                              Planners’ Response                                                                                        Recommendation
             •   Owners should be not be disadvantaged by any retrospective restrictions on residential use.
             •   Owners appreciate being free to live in the unit a few months of the year and make it available for short-
                 stay tourist accommodation the rest of the year
             •   Rezoning it curtails our existing right to utilize the accommodation for permanent, semi-permanent or
                 short stay use.
             •   We need to be re-assured that our existing rights and those of others who have owned properties for
                 many years in the area are preserved.
             •   Want to be able to sell the unit to any class of persons without any residential conditions of usage, as we
                 have now.
             •   Would have no objection to the proposed zoning applying to new developments but feel it is unfair to
                 apply it retrospectively to existing buildings
             •   Change would damage the tone of the charming village-type atmosphere that Noosaville currently enjoys.
                 Much of this charm is exactly what draws the area's tourists in the first place.
             •   Those who own properties anywhere in the Noosa Shire Council should have the right to live in their
                 properties full time if they wish. I would ask that the council reconsider placing limitations on use of
                 dwellings.
 20827685    Submitter believes Ivory Palms at 73 Hilton Tce, Noosaville should be included in a residential zone rather       Ivory Palms is and has always been visitor accommodation. Its original approval is for visitor            That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission
             than Tourist Accommodation. There is already a large quantity of holiday accommodation in Noosa and               accommodation only and the current planning scheme reflects this. Protecting this site for family
             Noosaville, augmented by the number of people who rent owned accommodation through sites such as                  friendly, relatively affordable accommodation is considered important.
             AirBnB. Allowing the owners the choice whether to rent as holiday accommodation, long term rental or
             occupy the property would provide boost year round to the area and possibly provide accommodation for
             worker who service other parts of the tourist economy in the area.
 20865034    Owner of 7 Hilton Esplanade Noosaville objects to the fact their property is not included within the proposed     7 Hilton esplanade contains an older lowset building containing 3 holiday units. They have operated       That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission
             Tourist Accommodation Zone. Would be vehemently opposed to any move that sought to restrict any of the            as such for a long time but are zoned Detached Housing and under the 1985 Planning Scheme was
             usage rights to my property as Short-term rental accommodation as such changes would undoubtedly have             Residential Single Unit. It has not been zoned for holiday units and the draft scheme is just carrying
             economic ramifications for me and would probably decrease the value of my holding.                                forward the zone intention from the last two planning schemes which is attached housing.
             Surely blanket rezoning proposals affecting the Short-term accommodation industry amount to gross overkill        The units would have existing use rights, no change required.
             as a method of control for a relatively small problem.
 20865792    Existing development at 92 Hilton Terrace Noosaville is a detached dwelling which under the New Noosa             This property is currently zoned Attached Housing and transitioned to Medium Density Residential.         That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
             Plan is considered inconsistent impact in the Medium Density Residential Zone. The owner of the site seeks        There are a few areas of Medium Density Residential Zone that still contains detached houses.
             to retain the option to utilize the site for a dwelling.                                                          Many of them are older houses and it could be expected that at some stage in the future they will be
                                                                                                                               redeveloped for a higher yield of dwellings (eg dual occupancies or multiple dwellings). Given the
             The New Plan will require any changes or extensions to the existing lawful dwelling to lodge a planning           limited amount of land available for multiple housing it has been a deliberate decision to preclude
             application to Council. This is an unnecessary cost and waste of resources as it would be difficult for Council   such land being underutilised with new houses.
             to refuse any such extensions.
                                                                                                                               The property has a house and enjoys existing use rights as such. The owner may renovate, remodel
             The site may be redeveloped for units when there is a demand for such a use on the site. Until that time it is    or extend their house without needing planning approval from Council.
             inappropriate for Council to try and remove the existing residential use from the site.
                                                                                                                               It is considered important that the scheme makes a policy position that land zoned for Medium
             The Draft New Plan details that future development is to provide for increased housing choice. The use of the     Density Residential eventually fulfil its destiny to provide for provide for medium density multiple
             site for a dwelling provides an alternative choice of housing for the area.                                       dwellings, as outlined in the purpose of the zone. The current and future character of the
             The Draft New Plan details that variation in the character of neighbourhoods and the low scale nature of          neighbourhood has been accounted for when zoning this stretch of land.
             development is a desirable outcome. The use of the site for a dwelling therefore fulfills the outcome desired
             by Council.
 20866729    New Noosa Plan includes the area between Howard Street and Russell Street in the High Density Residential         Since the 1985 planning scheme the area between Howard Street and Russell Street has had a                That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
             Zone and Short Stay Map area.                                                                                     zoning that allowed for multiple dwellings or duplexes up to 3 storeys in height. Over the last few
                                                                                                                               decades many blocks have been redeveloped for either. There are relatively few lots remaining that
             The table of Assessment for this zone details that Dual Occupancies are inconsistent impact assessable.           would be redeveloped in the short term.
             Request that this be amended to include Dual Occupancies consistent code assessable.
                                                                                                                               The submitter’s property at 13 William Street has a site area of 1785.43m2. It is appreciated they
             Many of the lots in this area are ranging from 594m² to 600m²and are not suited to more intensive                 have a preference to divide this into separate lots for the construction of duplexes, yielding up to 6
             developments. The removal of the ability to develop lots of 600m² to include dual occupancies is not              dwellings. However it is considered, given the increased allowable plot ratio and height limit of 3
             supported.                                                                                                        storeys that this site could yield considerably more dwellings.
             It is not viable to develop small dwelling units in the area due to inherent land costs in this area.             The purpose of the high density residential zone if fundamentally to provide for high density multiple
             The removal of population density is supported.                                                                   dwellings. It was made apparent through the Housing Needs Analysis that Noosa Shire required an
                                                                                                                               increase in small dwellings. There is limited land available for the construction of multiple dwellings
             The increase in plot ratio in PO6 is supported.                                                                   and it would be considered under-utilisation of this land to support lower density housing.
             Continue to allow permanent residents in the area is supported.
 20832532    Operators and unit owners at Metzo Noosa Resort 152 -158 Noosa Parade Noosaville object to Residential            There are many unit complexes that were built specifically as visitor accommodation and individual        That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission
             zoning and want the same tourist zoning as other holiday complexes nearby be applied to Metzo.                    units have interchangeable existing use rights to be occupied permanently or short-term.
 20832531
             The units are set up for the primary purpose of Short-term holiday rental and are managed as such. The            Not all sites used for both permanent and visitor accommodation have been included in the Tourist


Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Page 119
Log in to download the original file

2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report(PDF, 4MB).pdf · 3.8 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.