Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Submitter Submission and Grounds of Submission Planners’ Response Recommendation
The Noosa plan highlights the need for increased retirement and aged care living. This area would be very
appropriate for such a facility.
20858821 Lower density apartments a better use of site
20858822 provide an alternative range of smaller housing
20858626 more housing for the many new families and retirees which move to Noosa for the relaxed lifestyle
20868429 To protect current residential amenity, the undeveloped lands should be more appropriately zoned for
permanent residential accommodation and/or retirement/aged care and/or a mixture of both. This would
20867326 maintain higher levels of residential amenity that will be lost if developed as a high density tourist resort
20868031 development.
Allow subject land to be developed at a reasonable density and be used for permanent residential uses only,
generally akin to the existing developments on the northern side of Serenity Close (eg at a density of around
27 dwellings per hectare or approximately 66 units on the 3.7ha subject site). This would result in the ability
to better maintain and protect the significant environmental values of the site and retain more vegetation;
ensure traffic congestion/impacts can be reasonably managed and further congestion limited; ensure amenity
impacts on existing residents are able to be suitably managed and the existing residential amenity of Serenity
Close can be maintained; and ensure no land use conflicts between permanent and short-term residential
activities occur.
20858919 A smaller scale exclusive 6 star hotel on no more than 50%
20864554 Look at bringing the traffic for the Resort in via Coral Tree Av into Banksia av. Relocate the closure of
Banksia so it is just before the roundabout to avoid the street being used to skip the roundabout in the
20872027 junction and exit at Katharina street to Hastings street. By doing this it would reduce the congestion at the
junction round about and also reduce the traffic moving along Grant street.
Suggests a smaller range of around 30/40 apartments with around 70/80 rooms is the maximum visitor
accommodation that the site can viably support.
Table 18.2 Submissions from Significant Changes Consultation
Submitter Submission and Grounds of Submission Planners’ Response Recommendation
21004915 Submission reinforces support for how the Planning Scheme deals with this site. Offers strong support for the Noted. That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
changes relating to the site. Unitywater is committed to facilitating and supporting community uses and
activities on some of it's surplus land assets.
21006196 Seqwater thanks Council for amending the split zoning on Lot 1 RP800331, to now cover the entirety of the This submission is not in response to a significant change That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
lot so that it aligns with the Noosa Water Treatment Plant (WTP) upgrade. Seqwater has noticed the 2018
version of the scheme annotated the site “1”, for Utility installation in the Community Facilities Zone. However The draft scheme as advertised in February 2019 showed all of 400 Lake Macdonald Drive (Lot 1 on
this annotation has been omitted in the “significant“ changes version. This will result in a Utility installation RP 800331) in the Community Facilities Zone with a specific designation for 1. Utility Installation, just
moving from Code assessment to Impact assessment as per categories of development and assessment in like the adjoining property to the south. These properties collectively contain most of the major water
Table 5.5.11. Seqwater is concerned by the possible cost, length of assessment and potential for delay which supply infrastructure associated with Lake Macdonald.
will be created by this minor omission in the future. Seqwater does not see the rationale for this change. This Neither the zoning nor the annotation changed with the significant changes. The submitter stated
site contains an existing utility the version of the mapping reviewed by the submitter did not show annotation layer and they thought
installation, which was a utility installation even prior to the transfer of the WTP during the millennium drought. the “1” had been removed which would have then triggered assessment for their operation. This is
not the case. The site is definitely still annotated for Utility Installation.
Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan Page 131
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.