Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Submitter Submission and Grounds of Submission Planners’ Response Recommendation
Likewise, assuming that everyone living at Black Mountain travels to Cooroy for higher order services (not all
do), the combined population is 5235 (ABS estimate).
While the Queensland Government mandates that the Unitywater data be used in the Noosa Plan, some
further filter/adjustment/analysis is required to assist council officers plan the scale and location of services
and facilities based on the favoured town accessed by the urban residents of rural towns, as well as the
'balance of rural' cohort living nearby.
20867296 It is questionable as to whether the total population targets for Noosa (specified within the DMaTT growth Council is currently investigating a number of transport related initiatives within the coastal areas of the That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission
forecasts) will be realised, especially considering the ambitious small unit targets within existing centres. Shire and methods to promote greater walking and cycling and use of public transport.
Many of the unit development sites close to the beaches, river and amenities are not achieving predicted
residential yields because of the preference for larger houses and penthouse apartments. This is also Development forecasts for the proposed New Noosa Plan have been staged over 5 year cohorts and
affecting the residential cohesion of the existing Noosa communities and making for a more homogenous then at ultimate capacity. The development outcomes result in a population forecast based on the
(less multi-cultural) and older (semi-retired) community. As a younger person (35) with three kids – I am the highest level of development capable to ensure infrastructure planning supports the highest level of
minority. However, we do need to provide for all key demographics – not just more aged care facilities – growth and development, so there is no shortfall in infrastructure. The New Noosa Plan allows for a
reinforcing the homogeneous trend. range in housing types catering to a range of housing needs, including small dwellings for singles, small
families and retired down sizers.
Support further initiatives to not build any additional accesses to Noosa Heads. Encourage contributions in
lieu money to be used for free bus initiatives and better pedestrian and cycling and scooter facilities.
20866922 Petition of 86 signatures The previous Noosa Council Priority Infrastructure Plan included a pathway along the northern shores of That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of these 2 submissions
Lake Doonella. On preparation of the current and draft new LGIP for the New Noosa Plan, the pathway
20867296 Boardwalk was originally proposed along the northern shores of Lake Doonella and removed from the was removed because it was not considered to have a trunk function.
proposed LGIP maps.
The suggested pathway has a recreation function, not a trunk function and is therefore not included in
The alignment was to be established by 2020 in the previous Noosa Plan PIP. Still a need to allow for a the LGIP. 2.5m wide pathways are provided along both sides of Poinciana Avenue that link to the
waterfront connection between Tewantin CBD and other community services and major residential Tewantin Primary School and Tewantin township.
population in Tewantin.
A pathway connection between Shield Street and Doonella Street as suggested by the submitter is not
Seeks to include a 260m pathway connecting Shields St to Doonella St within the existing Unitywater sewer considered “Trunk” infrastructure as it provides a localised link between two relatively small residential
alignment. The alignment is already compromised by existing infrastructure requiring regular vegetation catchments.
slashing and maintenance.
Alignment proposed is entirely within Council owned land and does not require clearing of any mangroves or
protected vegetation.
Cost would be minimal and could include a 3m wide gravel finish, boardwalk or concrete pathway. Council
promotes the Lake Doonella Lake Ride and parkrun but there is limited connection to the lake on the
northern side.
Should not be disregarded on CPTED grounds – there are novel ways of lighting the pathway up at night
time (like the LEDs in Noosa).
Pathway connecting Shields St to Doonella St Tewantin needs to be included within the LGIP.
Finalise the full pathway connection around Lake Doonella including the missing areas around the
Noosaville Industry and Bushlands Drive connections. This should not be put off for another 5-10 years. This
is an asset people would like to experience as a tourist and residential feature.
20833649 Suggests new playground (such as flying fox, or maybe something like pirate park in Gympie Terrace) new Noted. The LIGIP doesn’t provide for playgrounds and parks at a local level. The concerns raised will be That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
barbecue, bicycle pathway in Cooroibah because this one finish on McKinnon drive sadly. passed onto Council’s Infrastructure services department.
Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan Page 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.