Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Submitter Submission and Grounds of Submission Planners’ response Recommendation
• Requests for the volume to be turned down are either ignored or result in aggression. Police are
called and never respond as they have better things to do. Owners or agents are informed and
apologise but it continues.
• The owners of each residence in each street within the high density accommodation area should be
sent a communication to sign up to a “Street control covenant” whereby they commit to being good
landlords; considerate of the neighbourhood and environment and in doing so receive some sort of
incentive for participating - this reward cost would negate the costs that exist now with bad behaviour.
• In regard to applications for material change of use that could affect amenity, we would like to see
neighbours notified that an application has been made and invite them to comment if they wish. At
present, neighbours are kept in the dark about these issues, which creates ill-will and distrust. It is
their amenity that is affected and they should be at least consulted before and decision is considered.
We see another advantage in that when a proponent knows neighbours will be able to comment, it will
encourage the proponent to consult the neighbourhood and discourage some types of "gaming the
system".
If Short-term Stay via Airbnb and others are allowed into our Medium Density residential
• Our street is in trouble.
• All surrounding properties around us are currently used for Short-term accommodation and majority of
issues arise form an excessive number of people in the space such as noise, rubbish, car parking and
lack of concern or regard for neighbours.
• Humans need deep uninterrupted sleep to stay healthy and function properly but it is impossible to
become used to the type of sleep disturbance cause by a holiday house full of people.
• Cites an example that is advertised as sleeping 16 people and will have at least half that many again
as guests.
• All alfresco outside lighting and fountains should be switched off at 8pm.
• Neighbour complaints should be dealt with immediately. As Noosa is geographically compact, this
should be within 30 minutes. A special independent policeman should be on call, and be paid for
using the tourist levy. It is unconstitutional and unjust to zone and protect some residents of the
Noosa Shire from the noise and impact of whole house holiday letting, while we who suffer the most
are left without any protection by your Noosa Plan. (Those near the river and beaches).
• Rental properties let to permanent residents come under the Residential Tenancy Act but holiday
houses where tourists stay just a few days are not controlled through this Act. Property owners insist
they have a right to remotely run a “hotel” in residential areas. Tourists enjoy all the rights of
residents and neighbours have no right to stop them. Neighbours’ properties lose their re-sale value.
• Houses are now purposely built to accommodate large numbers of tourists (eg 5 or 6 bedrooms each
with ensuits, 2 large kitchens, garaging for 1 car only.
• These properties need to be registered and subject to rules with compliance or have permits revoked.
• Residents must have access to responsible persons 24/7 who can respond in emergencies.
• Suggests: a curfew on noise levels; levies to support infrastructure; requiring business registration of
owners of short-term rentals, including tax requirements; visible notice of responsible manager and
24/7 contact details
• Require an assessable DA required for any further development of whole house short-term
accommodation anywhere in the shire
• Consider a rating differential for properties used for short-term accommodation, not just the tourism
levy
• In the Medium Density Residential Zone it should also be necessary for body corporate approval to
accompany an application to Council.
Carparking impacts of short term accommodation
• The number of cars guests bring with them (in addition to those of their day visitors) significantly
exceeds on-site car parking available given a house is only required to provide 1 car parking space
and sometimes the garaging on site is unavailable to guests because the owner has their own car or
possessions in it. This particularly problematic in cul-de-sacs, narrow streets, where there’s a
cumulative impact of multiple holiday homes, and where it is close enough to the Beach and visitor
centres that parking is already at a premium (e.g. Little Cove, Sunshine Beach, Noosa Sound)
• There are more cars parked on the roads in front of houses while there are perfectly good garages on
the site. Some holiday lets have converted their garaging into bedrooms to accommodate even more
guests and further exacerbate the parking problem
• It makes it generally harder for residents to get around because of parking congestion.
Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan Page 41
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.