Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Submitter Submission and Grounds of Submission Planners’ Response Recommendation
or Rural Residential zone and 65m2 in any other zone. The grounds for the proposed change are that the of whether it was in a rural or more urban area.
number of allowable bedrooms (two) remains unchanged and therefore will not result in an increase in the
occupancy numbers. The increase in floor area would relate to living areas and will not alter the impacts to
development on lots in larger Rural and Rural Residential zones.
20846326 Strongly objects to proposed reduction in development rights, specifically provision to build a single Noted. The intention is to increase housing diversity and choice in Noosa Shire through increasing the That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
dwelling house in the Medium Density Residential Zone. Requests 6.3.2.2 be amended to say: potential for more dwellings via infill development rather than rezoning more greenfield sites. Removing
single detached dwellings as consistent development maximises the potential of Medium Density Zone to
Purpose and overall outcomes deliver more housing choice in line with the overall outcomes for housing across the Shire. Existing
The purpose of the Medium density residential zone is to provide for:- single dwellings can remain.
a) medium density multiple dwellings and single dwellings; and
b) community uses, and small-scale services, facilities and infrastructure, to support local residents.
20856421 Request Table of Assessment (5.5.2.) for Medium Density Residential Zone be amended to make Recommend the table of development 5.5.2 be amended to allow for code assessment where it is the That Table 5.5.2 be amended to allow for the expansion of an existing relocatable home
Relocatable Home Park code assessable rather than impact assessable development. This change extension of an existing relocatable home park. A new relocatable home park, as per retirement facility park through code assessment, while it remains impact assessable otherwise.
reflects that any application is more technical in achieving compliance with the key development should still be subject to impact assessment.
parameters. The site is separated from adjoining residential development and includes large setbacks to
neighbours which are not proposed to change, therefore unlikely to result in any adverse submissions.
20831259 Submitter supports new provisions that promote multiple small dwellings and bonus provisions for 5% Submitter is potentially concerned about properties zoned Medium Density Residential which already That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
relaxation of GFA and site coverage, however there will be many owners who wish to densify their blocks have one house but would like to take up the option of develop a second dwelling to form a dual
with only a single 90m2 extra dwelling or perhaps 2X 90m2 dwellings. They will also require a relaxation in occupancy, which is obviously a preferred use. While there may be a good argument for relaxation of the
GFA and coverage to accommodate parking etc. Would you please consider softening the relaxation provisions in some circumstances, staff are of the view that this would need to be considered on a case
coverage for residents who wish to add only a single extra 90m2 dwelling. This will promote a much faster by case basis and considered on their merit and through the application and assessment process having
uptake of this new idea within the community and importantly it will allow for flexibility for blocks with regard to the size of the lot and the size of the existing house, without the bonus provisions being
existing homes occupying the block. implied.
20867988 Inconsistent provisions for Noosa Waters for Low Density Residential verses Medium Density Residential. Include provisions relating to Noosa Water in the Low Density Residential Zone Code into the Medium That provisions be included in the Medium Density Residential zone code to ensure land
Density Residential Zone code so they apply to Sunseeker Close and Noosa Entrance complex. adjoining the revetment wall and for a width of 4.5 metres serves flood detention and
The Draft New Plan has Noosa Waters Waterway Provisions in A10 & A11 of the Low Density Residential amenity functions, free of structures and impervious surfaces.
Zone Code - managing flood detention and revetment wall integrity, as well as amenity functions in
Performance Outcomes of the code. This formed part of a package of significant changes to the draft scheme re-
advertised from 13 September. During the subsequent consultation submissions
There is no such provisions in Medium Density Residential Zone Code - include P10 & P11 Performance no further submissions were received.
Outcomes of the Low Density Residential Zone Code into the Medium Density Residential Zone Code.
No further amendments are proposed in response to this submission.
20823483 Resort managers support Tourist Accommodation zoning of resorts or any means of restricting owner The New Noosa Pan is encouraging the development of small dwelling units into the future to provide That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
occupiers in resorts. Management rights have been purchased at considerable cost and operators feel more housing choice for permanent residents generally which may assist in reducing the demand for
20823299 they have no control over their investment. It reduces control onsite management have over situations permanent residents in resort complexes.
20827956 such as anti-social behaviour, renovation noise, carparking, smoking etc.
Council understands the interface issues that occur as a result of having both permanent and short-term
20831083 Support council’s attempt to protect the tourism industry within our community but regret nothing can residents in resorts, however the majority were approved to allow for both uses and these existing use
override existing Development Approval. rights will remain when the new plan is introduced.
20832531
Major concerns about losing apartments out of letting pool to Owner/Occupiers and AIRBnB, which then Staff have, elsewhere in this report recommended changes to curb the growth of visitor accommodation
20868814 destroys and undervalues our investment. Ongoing battle around many resorts as there’s a lack of respect outside of managed premises.
for by-laws and design purpose of the visitor resort.
With a growing number of resorts being overrun with permanents and live in’s poses a strong risk of losing
quality onsite managers and Management Rights ownership due to the lack of income in management
rights through loss of holiday units.
Loss of holiday accommodation to permanent residents or lock ups - if tourists will have nowhere or limited
places to stay they will not come.
Visitors spend money with other operators in the region. This filters a lot of money out of the local
economy. Too many owner occupiers in resorts will eventually mean the end of tourism based business in
Noosaville due to them not using the watercraft hire companies.
Live in’s and permanents take over resorts and erode the ambiance all resorts should have. Residents can
cause friction with paying guests. Some feel as though they own the resort and that holiday guests
inconvenience them. This takes away from the guest experience and in turn can decrease return cliental
and deteriorate the resorts reputation.
Permanent residents are known to ignore body corporate bylaws such as appearance of the lot, noise,
carparking, authority of the onsite management and use of common areas. Permanents living in a unit all
year round will significantly wear down a unit more rapidly than a holiday unit that is maintained and
cleaned at least twice a week.
Some investors can be turned away from purchasing in a particular resort if they see it trending towards
Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan Page 68
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.