Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report

of 169

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
 Submitter   Submission and Grounds of Submission                                                                           Planners’ Response                                                                                         Recommendation
             or Rural Residential zone and 65m2 in any other zone. The grounds for the proposed change are that the         of whether it was in a rural or more urban area.
             number of allowable bedrooms (two) remains unchanged and therefore will not result in an increase in the
             occupancy numbers. The increase in floor area would relate to living areas and will not alter the impacts to
             development on lots in larger Rural and Rural Residential zones.
 20846326    Strongly objects to proposed reduction in development rights, specifically provision to build a single         Noted. The intention is to increase housing diversity and choice in Noosa Shire through increasing the     That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
             dwelling house in the Medium Density Residential Zone. Requests 6.3.2.2 be amended to say:                     potential for more dwellings via infill development rather than rezoning more greenfield sites. Removing
                                                                                                                            single detached dwellings as consistent development maximises the potential of Medium Density Zone to
             Purpose and overall outcomes                                                                                   deliver more housing choice in line with the overall outcomes for housing across the Shire. Existing
             The purpose of the Medium density residential zone is to provide for:-                                         single dwellings can remain.

             a)   medium density multiple dwellings and single dwellings; and
             b)   community uses, and small-scale services, facilities and infrastructure, to support local residents.
 20856421    Request Table of Assessment (5.5.2.) for Medium Density Residential Zone be amended to make                    Recommend the table of development 5.5.2 be amended to allow for code assessment where it is the           That Table 5.5.2 be amended to allow for the expansion of an existing relocatable home
             Relocatable Home Park code assessable rather than impact assessable development. This change                   extension of an existing relocatable home park. A new relocatable home park, as per retirement facility    park through code assessment, while it remains impact assessable otherwise.
             reflects that any application is more technical in achieving compliance with the key development               should still be subject to impact assessment.
             parameters. The site is separated from adjoining residential development and includes large setbacks to
             neighbours which are not proposed to change, therefore unlikely to result in any adverse submissions.
 20831259    Submitter supports new provisions that promote multiple small dwellings and bonus provisions for 5%            Submitter is potentially concerned about properties zoned Medium Density Residential which already         That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
             relaxation of GFA and site coverage, however there will be many owners who wish to densify their blocks        have one house but would like to take up the option of develop a second dwelling to form a dual
             with only a single 90m2 extra dwelling or perhaps 2X 90m2 dwellings. They will also require a relaxation in    occupancy, which is obviously a preferred use. While there may be a good argument for relaxation of the
             GFA and coverage to accommodate parking etc. Would you please consider softening the relaxation                provisions in some circumstances, staff are of the view that this would need to be considered on a case
             coverage for residents who wish to add only a single extra 90m2 dwelling. This will promote a much faster      by case basis and considered on their merit and through the application and assessment process having
             uptake of this new idea within the community and importantly it will allow for flexibility for blocks with     regard to the size of the lot and the size of the existing house, without the bonus provisions being
             existing homes occupying the block.                                                                            implied.
 20867988    Inconsistent provisions for Noosa Waters for Low Density Residential verses Medium Density Residential.        Include provisions relating to Noosa Water in the Low Density Residential Zone Code into the Medium        That provisions be included in the Medium Density Residential zone code to ensure land
                                                                                                                            Density Residential Zone code so they apply to Sunseeker Close and Noosa Entrance complex.                 adjoining the revetment wall and for a width of 4.5 metres serves flood detention and
             The Draft New Plan has Noosa Waters Waterway Provisions in A10 & A11 of the Low Density Residential                                                                                                                       amenity functions, free of structures and impervious surfaces.
             Zone Code - managing flood detention and revetment wall integrity, as well as amenity functions in
             Performance Outcomes of the code.                                                                                                                                                                                         This formed part of a package of significant changes to the draft scheme re-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       advertised from 13 September. During the subsequent consultation submissions
             There is no such provisions in Medium Density Residential Zone Code - include P10 & P11 Performance                                                                                                                       no further submissions were received.
             Outcomes of the Low Density Residential Zone Code into the Medium Density Residential Zone Code.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       No further amendments are proposed in response to this submission.
 20823483    Resort managers support Tourist Accommodation zoning of resorts or any means of restricting owner              The New Noosa Pan is encouraging the development of small dwelling units into the future to provide        That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
             occupiers in resorts. Management rights have been purchased at considerable cost and operators feel            more housing choice for permanent residents generally which may assist in reducing the demand for
 20823299    they have no control over their investment. It reduces control onsite management have over situations          permanent residents in resort complexes.
 20827956    such as anti-social behaviour, renovation noise, carparking, smoking etc.
                                                                                                                            Council understands the interface issues that occur as a result of having both permanent and short-term
 20831083    Support council’s attempt to protect the tourism industry within our community but regret nothing can          residents in resorts, however the majority were approved to allow for both uses and these existing use
             override existing Development Approval.                                                                        rights will remain when the new plan is introduced.
 20832531
             Major concerns about losing apartments out of letting pool to Owner/Occupiers and AIRBnB, which then           Staff have, elsewhere in this report recommended changes to curb the growth of visitor accommodation
 20868814    destroys and undervalues our investment. Ongoing battle around many resorts as there’s a lack of respect       outside of managed premises.
             for by-laws and design purpose of the visitor resort.
             With a growing number of resorts being overrun with permanents and live in’s poses a strong risk of losing
             quality onsite managers and Management Rights ownership due to the lack of income in management
             rights through loss of holiday units.
             Loss of holiday accommodation to permanent residents or lock ups - if tourists will have nowhere or limited
             places to stay they will not come.
             Visitors spend money with other operators in the region. This filters a lot of money out of the local
             economy. Too many owner occupiers in resorts will eventually mean the end of tourism based business in
             Noosaville due to them not using the watercraft hire companies.
             Live in’s and permanents take over resorts and erode the ambiance all resorts should have. Residents can
             cause friction with paying guests. Some feel as though they own the resort and that holiday guests
             inconvenience them. This takes away from the guest experience and in turn can decrease return cliental
             and deteriorate the resorts reputation.
             Permanent residents are known to ignore body corporate bylaws such as appearance of the lot, noise,
             carparking, authority of the onsite management and use of common areas. Permanents living in a unit all
             year round will significantly wear down a unit more rapidly than a holiday unit that is maintained and
             cleaned at least twice a week.
             Some investors can be turned away from purchasing in a particular resort if they see it trending towards



Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Page 68
Log in to download the original file

2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report(PDF, 4MB).pdf · 3.8 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.