Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Submitter Submission and Grounds of Submission Planners’ Response Recommendation
16/0047.01. The site has had commercial uses for over 20 years with a transport depot being documented proposed in Noosaville and is considered a consistent approach to larger sites in existing centres
as operating on the site prior to 1997. The proposed zoning finally recognize the sites commercial excluding Noosa Business Centre.
relevance to the centre and the proposed zoning is appropriate for the existing use on site.
20863351 Overall outcome ‘(e) of the Tewantin Locality Plan should be amended to include the following additions: Review the small dwelling GFA – potentially it could be rather an average of 90m for a development or That:
potentially increased the GFA to 100m². This was also raised by 3 other submitters.
20868507 “Tewantin town centre includes mixed-use …..Poinciana Ave and Pelican Street” • The small dwelling maximum gross floor area be increased to100m².
Heights to remain at 2 storeys however generally some acceptances to height are made for key design • Pelican street to be included in overall outcomes for Tewantin (f)
Small Dwellings between 90-110m² to be consistent impact assessment. elements consistent with the locality such as roof pitch and gables via the development application
process. Council at its Special Meeting of 12 September 2019 resolved that small dwellings
Height provision to allow for gables to partially exceed the 10m height limit. maximum GFA be increased to 100m2.
Plot ratio to be increased to 1:1 to allow for residential mixed use on larger development sites. Plot ratio to remain at 0.8:1 in District centres. Any dwellings within the district centre zone are to be
small dwellings and therefore a bonus is not considered necessary. This formed part of a package of significant changes to the draft scheme re-
The pelican street setback to be 2m consistent with the existing side buildings. advertised from 13 September. During the subsequent consultation period an
Pelican street to be included in overall outcomes for Tewantin additional submission was received regarding the change in small dwellings. Refer
to submissions below however no further changes are recommended to this
provision.
20828661 Support for zoning 31 Maple St to District Centre Noted That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
20866728 Support for Framework and Character Plan in relation to: Noted That no change be made to the New Noosa Plan as a result of this submission.
• The addition of the level pedestrian crossing across the railway line providing improved connection for
pedestrians and cyclists between the two sides of town. Gaining an all abilities railway crossing for
pedestrians as well as cyclists has been high on the Chamber’s agenda and we would welcome the
implementation.
• Protecting and enhancing the streetscape and extending the streetscape on both sides of the railway
line. Endorsement of the Maple Streetscape to be used as a benchmark for al primary streetscape
areas and for improvement of Emerald and Diamond Streetscapes. We agree that these treatments
should be consistent with existing streetscape elements.
The two proposed intersection upgrades noted on Figure 7.2.2.4 to occur as a priority with a solution that
puts the safety of pedestrians, cyclists and motorist is paramount
20863351 115-117 Poinciana are under the same ownership and have rear boundaries on the same alignment. Given Agree to include 115 Poinciana as part of key Development site with 117 Poinciana Ave. That 115 Poinciana Ave is included as part of the Key development site at 117 Poinciana
the lot sizes and configurations these sites will not be developed separately. 117 Poinciana Ave is identified Ave as adjoining and both sites will be redeveloped at the same time.
20868507 as a key development site in the Tewantin Framework and Character Plan and it is requested that this be Consideration of including the north eastern corner of Lot 20 SP2734111 fronting Poinciana as a key
extended to include 115 Poinciana Ave as part of this key development site. development site. This site has been significantly redeveloped recently through the RSL redevelopment
which fronts Memorial Ave and has a significant built form and scale for the size of the site. Acknowledge
Include the north- eastern corner of Lot 20 SP2734111 fronting Poinciana Ave and Pelican St at as a key that any future redevelopment would contribute to the streetscape character in the immediate vicinity
Development site on the Tewantin Framework and Character Plan. being the northern end of Poinciana Ave, and Pelican Street. However any redevelopment of the site
could still be undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Draft Planning Scheme regardless of
being identified as a key Development site.
20867167 Noosa Junction Generally Noosa Junction Generally That:
20867153 Concern over the statement regarding no more additional supermarkets be established as this could create If there is an application to relocate an existing supermarket this can be managed as part of any Material • the consistent uses for the southern side of Bottlebrush Ave in the Major Centre
issues if there is a development proposal to relocate an existing supermarket while the existing premises is Change of use Application. Zone be amended to reflect uses similar to the Health and Wellbeing Precinct in
20868181 still trading. Noosaville.
The wording referring to Arcadia Street can be amended to read, “with reasonable proximity to Arcadia
20868822 Remove the direct reference to Arcadia Street and replace with more general terminology such as “in Street” • the car parking rate for offices in Noosa Junction be amended to one space per
reasonable proximity to Arcadia Street.” Arcadia lane should focus on uses that create more activation in 20m² for the ground floor; and one space per 30m² for the second and third floors.
20868221 The proposed setback at 0m would also require car parking for the use of this portion of the site. It still
daytime hours and contribute to the open space area proposed I the Framework and Character Plan • a provision be included in the plan to allow for the substitution of motorcycle spaces
20868813 enables uses within the setback such as outdoor dining and display of goods etc. for car spaces as per the current Noosa Plan.
Setbacks to Noosa Drive- The proposed setback of 3m for the ground floor, where previously it was 0m
20866920 setback effectively renders useless a large area of land unable to accommodate the car parking that would The draft planning scheme includes an Editor’s Note, “For properties mentioned in section (a)(ii) above, • the wording referring to Arcadia Street be amended to read, “with reasonable
be required across the site and reduces the ability to have an active street frontage. It is considered more the minimum setback can be considered as part of a separate urban design and planning study to review proximity to Arcadia Street”.
20868611 land use, built form and streetscape outcomes for these properties.” The awning provisions could also be
palatable from a design and development perspective to retain the zero metre setback at ground level to • that operation hours in the Hospitality Precinct be amended to be:
20867894 maintain a consistent building line to the street frontage as per the remainder of the Major Centre Zone. It is reviewed as part of the above study or alternatively allow for open awnings within the setback
o 7:00am - 12 midnight Sunday to Thursday; and
requested that Council reconsider changing the minimum setback from 3m to 0m for the subject sites. Any infill development and redevelopment for Noosa junction will be subject to the provisions for the Draft
20865175 o 7:00am Friday to 2:00am Saturday; and
AO30 with respect to the provision of street awnings in new development. There could be considerable Planning Scheme and car parking and traffic will be considered as part of this assessment. Council’s
20865176 policy in the Transport Strategy and New Noosa Plan is to promote development in and around centres o 7:00am Saturday to 2:00am Sunday.
issues in providing awnings along those frontages that are not identified as primary active street frontage,
of those lots that are subject to the 5.5m setback. The draft Noosa Plan nominates different design to encourage more use and increase the viability of public and active transport options for the Junction
20868803 This formed part of a package of significant changes to the draft scheme re-
outcomes for those sites with a primary active street frontage on the Noosa Junction Framework and thereby reducing private car use. The current Noosa Plan also allows for 3 storey development and the
20864488 setback and plot ratio provisions will address any potential overshadowing. The development of the advertised from 13 September. During the subsequent consultation period
Character Plan.
proposed road will be subject to further planning which will consider issues such as clearing etc. additional submissions related to car parking were received. Refer to submissions
20864837 Urban Infill – concerns regarding proposed infill in Noosa Junction in the form of mixed use and higher in Table 10.2 however no further changes are recommended to this provision.
density development as is may impact on lifestyles including lack of parking, loss of amenity, shading from Recommend restricting uses on the southern side of Bottlebrush Ave that would have potential amenity
20867986 impacts on the adjoining residential development similar to the health and Wellbeing Precinct in
new 3 storey development and changes to Pinaroo Park including loss of vegetation for the proposed road.
20868822 Supports redevelopment of major centres provided it avoids adverse impacts on adjoining residential areas Mary/Thomas Street in Noosaville.
20868221 and is designed to sensitively respond to physical characteristics and constraints of land including Any redevelopment of the car park at Bottlebrush Ave will need to consider the inclusion of existing car
Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan Page 75
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.