Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

APPENDIX B - Local Assessment

Attached to the e-mail MCU18/0204 - Development Application - 6 Heron Street, Peregian Beach.

of 46

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Specific Outcomes                 Probable Solutions                Response
                                 If in the Noosaville Locality
                                 Semi-Attached Housing zone
                                 buildings do not exceed
                                 a plot ratio of 0.45:1.

                                 S12.12
                                 If in the Noosaville Locality
                                 Attached Housing Zone the
                                 maximum gross floor area is
                                 equivalent to the maximum
                                 allowable population in persons
                                 multiplied by 40 m2.

                                 S12.13
                                 Within the Shire Business
                                 Centre Zone, the maximum plot
                                 ratio for development within
                                 the following precincts is:
                                  a) Precincts B1 and B2
                                      combined 0.5:1
                                  b) Precinct B3 - 0.8
                                  c) Precincts E1 to E7 - 0.6
                                  d) Precinct RES - 0.6
                                  e) Precinct REC/MU – 0.1.
Roof Form
O15                              S15.1
                                                                    The proposal does include a
Roof forms—                      Buildings and structures do not
                                 include roof top terrace areas.    roof terrace, as part of the
a) contribute positively to the
   local skyline;                                                   restaurant space. Justification
b) complement the low density                                       relating to this is included in
   character of the locality;                                       Section 5 of the Town Planning
c) do not present an                                                report.
   appearance of excessive
   bulk to side neighbours (ie.
   avoid low pitched roofs or
   box profiles/parapets without
   eaves); use simple
   traditional roof designs; and
d) do not create opportunities
   for residents to overlook the
   private open space areas of
   neighbouring properties.
14.96 Effects of use
Lighting
O19                              S19.1
                                                                    N/A
Lighting associated with the use A 1.5m landscaped buffer
or works does not have an        separates any private tennis       Outdoor lighting is not proposed
adverse impact upon the          court or other sports court from   as part of the development.
amenity enjoyed by users of      side property boundaries;
adjoining or nearby premises nor
do it cause unreasonable         S19.2
disturbance to local fauna.      Tennis courts or half courts are
                                 fenced with fencing of 3.6m in
                                 height for a full sized court or
                                 2.4m in height for a half court;
Log in to download the original file

APPENDIX B - Local Assessment.pdf · 916 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.