Council archive · source document
Further Advice Assessment Manager 51983.3225.18
Issue – Setbacks & Landscaping All Levels Acceptable Outcome AO13.1 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone Code requires a 7 metre setback from the front boundary to Noosa Parade. It is acknowledged that the subject site adjoins the Sheraton Service Road, however this is parallel to Noosa Parade and as such the requirement is relevant to this development. In addition, the subject site is located on a mapped major road under Figure 7.2.5.5 Hastings Street Framework & Character Plan in the Noosa Heads Local Plan Code. AO4 of the Noosa Heads Local Plan Code requires development adjacent to the major road network (including Noosa Parade) to incorporate landscaping that complements the natural species occurring in the local area, protects existing vegetation within the road reserve and incorporates design elements that add visual interest to the streetscape. The proposed setback also limits capacity for meaningful landscaping between dwellings and along the Noosa Parade frontage. It is also noted that proposal is unable to provide landscaping in accordance with the existing Operational Works for Landscaping approval (OPW22/0022). As such, the proposed setbacks to the south / south-western boundary is not supported. The extent of terraces in these locations must be substantially reduced. Ground Level The built to boundary garage raises concerns in regards to the setback to the adjoining unit. It is acknowledged that the garage is parallel with the adjoining units garage, however the proposal would result in a 0.6m setback between the dwellings, which is not supported due to the inability to provide suitable and sufficient vegetation within proximity to the Noosa Parade frontage. Level 1 The 0m setback to the eastern boundary for the planter is not supported, and as per the above, results in a maximum setback of 0.6m from the adjoining dwelling. The planter adds bulk to the development and is unlikely to be able to be maintained due to the design and should be removed from the plans. Roof Level The planter located on the southern façade of the building encroaches into common property. This planter adds unnecessary bulk to the development and is not supported. Advice Required 3. Provide amended plans increasing the setback to the south / south-western boundary in order to provide sufficient landscaping along the street frontage. 4. Provide setback details to neighbouring villas for all levels (Units 15, 17 and 18). 5. Provide section plans that include the neighbouring units (Units 15 and 17). 6. Provide a plan that indicates all vegetation proposed to be removed to facilitate the new dwelling unit and detail potential impacts on existing and adjoining vegetation. 7. Provide a conceptual landscape plan in accordance with the Landscape Code in Noosa Plan, taking into account existing OPW22/0022. Issue – Roof Terrace The vertical timber battening on the roof terrace is to be roofed with timber beams. It is noted that the definition for a storey includes ‘a roofed structure that is on, or part of, a rooftop, if the structure does not only accommodate building plant and equipment’. This portion of the development would therefore be defined as a storey and is not supported. In addition, the height of the timber screening is considered unnecessary if being provided for privacy screening purposes. Page 2 of 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Further Advice Assessment Manager 51983.3225.18Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 135 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.