Council archive · source document
Meeting papers
Very large file (150 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 210, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Note: 77% of the responses are ‘yes’ and ‘neutral’
UPDTATED PRIMARY RESULTS
Further improvement to support with more information:
Of those who responded ‘no’ we also asked if their position could change if concerns were addressed. Among the 86 ‘no’
responses, 44% (i.e., 38 respondents) agreed they would support the hotel development if these concerns were
addressed. So far as we are aware, all issues raised have been addressed conclusively in the development application and
experts’ reports. This is understandable given the accessibility to the large quantity of material and expert reports of the
development application.
If those respondents changed their minds after having their issues addressed, the ‘yes’ and ‘neutral’ positions would
result in 81% in favour or not bothered by the hotel development.
4
Page 210 of 518
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.