Original source · versioned page text
2021-12-07 Planning & Environment Committee Meeting Agenda - Updated
The original of this document is very large (15.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 7 DECEMBER 2021
(9) A further firebreak trail easement is also to be located within a 20-metre wide,
minimum width, within all lots that back onto the retained vegetation within Lot 12.
(10) As the width of the lot and therefore the total length of the firebreak trail is less than
100 metres a single access easement to a formed road is acceptable.
(11) I would note however, that the land is within an Urban Fire District and as such any
firebreak trail should be constructed to a standard that can be traversed by an urban
appliance and not a rural appliance as the Urban Appliance may be the first responder
to a vegetation fire within this area.
The above bushfire access/egress matters could be resolved by conditions, were all other matters
satisfactorily addressed.
Flood Hazard
Where development is located within areas at risk from natural hazards, the Overall Outcomes of
the Natural Hazard Overlay Code seek for “…development to be compatible with the hazard so as
not to place people and property at risk”. In addition, development is required to “…support and
not unduly burden disaster management response or recovery capacity and capabilities”.
The entire site is mapped as being affected by flood hazard under The Noosa Plan’s Natural
Hazard Overlay mapping. The application seeks approval to increase the number of lots thereby
increasing the number of people and property in a flood hazard area. The proposed development
intends to achieve flood immunity by modifying the landform through the introduction of fill on land
below the 1% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) level. The fill is proposed to create house
pads above the defined flood level of 2.3m AHD which the applicant suggests is a sufficient area
above the defined flood level to accommodate the intended future residential use.
The Natural Hazards Overlay Code requires development to “…have an effective evacuation route
that remains passable, with sufficient warning time, to enable people to progressively evacuate to
safe areas above the probable maximum flood”. The site is only accessible via Lake Weyba Drive
which is subject to inundation and is not driveable during a flood event and generally the area is
isolated for up to 3 days.
The applicant has provided a Flood and Stormwater Quantity Assessment which includes an
emergency management response. The report states:
There is potential for residents at the site to become isolated during extreme flood events
when Lake Weyba Drive is inundated. This risk will be managed by including a building
covenant on new allotments stating that homes are required to include a second story. The
upper floor level will serve as a flood refuge area and will be above the PMF flood level of
3.4 m AHD. This will provide a safe place for persons to take refuge during the extreme flood
events.
Residents who have medical needs that make sheltering in place inappropriate should
evacuate early if there is a major flood warning issued by relevant authorities. This is an
important message that should be communicated by Council to all residents along Lake
Weyba Drive and broadly across the LGA as part of general community engagement raising
flood awareness and resilience.
Council officers advised the applicant that conditions of a reconfiguration could not require future
dwellings to be two storeys. In response to this feedback the applicant has proposed that Council
can condition that all dwellings must have a habitable floor level above the PMF, being 3.4m AHD
stating that the Flood and Stormwater Quality Assessment can be amended to reflect this.
An external review of the flood report was provided by Switchback Consulting for Council which
notes that the proposed filling of the site does not result in direct off-site flood impacts.
As part of the settlement for the appeal at 135 Lake Weyba Drive a flood warning system was
implemented to provide sufficient time for occupiers to decide whether to evacuate or shelter in
place. The warning system was integrated into a community title arrangement whereby the body
Page 61 of 140
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.