Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Council archive · source document

19_01_16_AIA_Alba_25 Kauri St_V1 · MCU18/0165

Attached to the e-mail Arboricultural Impact Assessment report V1 - MCU18/0165.

of 19

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                            Consult Arborist

5.2     TREES 2 & 3 - OLIVINE STREET FRONTAGE
                                                        DBH     Height   Spread    TPZ     SRZ
 ID #     Botanical name               Common Name
                                                        (mm)     (m)       (m)     (m)     (m)
 T2       Eucalyptus tereticornis      Forest Red Gum    600    14-18      8-10    7.2     2.85
 T3       Eucalyptus tereticornis      Forest Red Gum    700    15-20     10-15    8.4       3
*Measurements estimated by eye and experience.

These two (2) trees are similar in location and form. Their overall health and condition appear
‘Good' or typical for a mature tree of this species with no major defects or disorders noted at
the time of the inspection.

The trees are located on the project boundary fence line with early mature naturally occurring
native and exotic trees species forming an understory. The project design positions these two
trees to the west of the Olivine Street driveway and directly to the rear of Units 11 – 17.

Noosa Council has expressed a need for the retention of these two trees to be reviewed as
they were originally proposed for removal.




                          Figure 4: Extract from the provided site plans with
                      tree locations marked and estimated TPZ shown in green


An upgrade of the road reserve has been mandated by Noosa Council with the proposed
construction of a pedestrian footpath and kerb positioned on the outer edge of the trees'
calculated TPZ which is not deemed as major TPZ intrusion.

The courtyard gardens of Units 11- 17 will be 6m deep from the property boundary beyond
which is the position of the dwellings (Units 11-17). On the plan, the intrusion into the trees'
TPZ is only classed as minor (up to 10% on one side). The primary cause for concern is the
construction/earthworks that will take place within the courtyard garden spaces including the
removal of the existing grass, any change in soil levels and the construction of fencing, paths,
hard landscaping, etc. These works will affect 50% of the trees' TPZs which is not considered
an acceptable amount of intrusion.




19_01_16_AIA_Alba_25 Kauri St_V1                                                    Page 11 of 19

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.5 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

19_01_16_AIA_Alba_25 Kauri St_V1.pdf · 1.5 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.