Council archive · source document
19_01_16_AIA_Alba_25 Kauri St_V1 · MCU18/0165
Attached to the e-mail Arboricultural Impact Assessment report V1 - MCU18/0165.
Consult Arborist
A PPENDIX 1 - D EFINITION OF T ERMS
The following criteria have been used in the VTA and arboricultural appraisal to gather information and determine the required
management options on the grounds of public health and safety. Measurements are approximate, made visually by eye unless
otherwise stated.
Age Class:
Young: Early stage of growth, immature size
Early Mature: Fast growing well-established tree which has not yet reached mature size
Mature: The tree reached its mature size, exhibits slowing growth rates with early stages of naturally forming dead
or dysfunctional wood.
Over Mature: The tree has reached mature size and is unlike to increase significantly in height or mass. Retrenchment of
the upper crown with increased vegetative vitality in lower crown, increased fungal activity and wood decay,
increase colonisation by flora and fauna.
Veteran: Tree with advanced retrenchment, a reduced crown size and annual increment growth, extensive hollowing,
crown collapse, low vigour, advance heartwood decay, advanced colonisation by fauna and flora.
Health:
Good: Tree with no defects or disorders which are notable. Full canopy with good colour foliage. Minimal pathogen
damage.
Fair: Tree with minor defects or disorders which are notable. Some deadwood within what can be an unbalanced
canopy, foliage generally with good colour although some discolouration may be present typical of species
in location. Minor pathogen damage.
Poor: Tree with major defects or disorders which are notable. The tree has considerable deadwood present,
discoloured or distorted leaves indicating a further decline of the tree. Detrimental pathogen damage.
Dead: Dead or dysfunctional moribund tree.
Structure:
Good: Tree with good unions and no branch defects. Sound trunk with no / minor defects. Good buttress and root
structure.
Fair: Tree with minor defects or disorders which are notable. Small areas of bark missing. Small cavities or minor
unfavourable branch unions may be present. Minor damage to roots.
Poor: Tree with major defects, large hollows, weak unions and/or problematic damaged roots.
Hazardous: This implies a tree with a major defect that may fail at any time
Protection of Trees:
DBH: Diameter at Breast Height - The approximate diameter of the trunk is measured visually in millimetres at a
height of 1.4m.
TPZ: As specified in the AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites, the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ)
is the principal means of protecting trees on development site. The TPZ is a combination of the root and
crown area requiring protection. This area should be isolated from construction disturbance so that the tree
can remain in a viable condition. The TPZ incorporates the Structural Root Zone (SRZ).
The radius of the TPZ is calculated for each tree by multiplying its trunk diameter at 1.4m above ground by
12, e.g. 300mm [email protected] x 12 = 3.6m Tree Protection Zone (TPZ)
A TPZ should not be less than 2m or greater than 15m (unless crown protection is required).
SRZ: Structural Root Zone (SRZ), as specified in AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites, is the
surface area of protection required to maintain a tree’s stability – a larger area is required to maintain a tree
in viable health. It is only necessary to calculate the SRZ when major encroachment into a TPZ is proposed.
The SRZ for trees with a trunk diameter less than 150mm will be 1.5m.
Tree Retention Value:
This retention value comes from the Institute of Australian Consulting Arborists (IACA), 2010, IACA Significance of a Tree,
Assessment Rating System (STARS), Institute of Australian Consulting Arboriculturists, Australia, www.iaca.org.au -
http://www.iaca.org.au/home/index.php/publications/71-stars
The process uses the Retention Value – Priority Matrix by assessing the Tree Significance Assessment Criteria and crossing
it with the Estimated Life Expectancy to determine the following ratings:
High: Priority for Retention
These trees are considered important for retention and should be retained and protected. Design
modification or relocation of building/s should be considered to accommodate the setbacks as prescribed by
the Australian Standard AS4970 Protection of trees on development sites. Tree sensitive construction
measures must be implemented e.g. pier and beam etc. if works are to proceed within the Tree Protection
Zone.
Medium: Consider for Retention
These trees may be retained and protected. These are considered less critical; however, their retention
should remain a priority with removal considered only if adversely affecting the proposed building/works and
all other alternatives have been considered and exhausted.
Low: Consider for Removal
These trees are not considered important for retention, nor require special works or design modification to
be implemented for their retention.
Remove: Priority for Removal
These trees are considered hazardous, or in irreversible decline, or weeds and should be removed
irrespective of development.
19_01_16_AIA_Alba_25 Kauri St_V1 Page 18 of 19
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
19_01_16_AIA_Alba_25 Kauri St_V1.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.5 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.