Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

_ASTP Town Planning Report

of 14

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

     •    The proposed development achieves a plot ratio of 0.27:1 in lieu of the maximum 0.4:1 permitted
          (AO11);
     •    Both frontages of the site comprise landscaping within the front setback (AO12.2);
     •    The proposed development presents as detached Dwellings with varying heights and built form
          styles to the street frontages to offer visual interest (AO14.1);
     •    Dwelling entrances are easily recognizable from each street frontage and include design
          elements in the front façade of the built forms including extended eaves and window openings.
          (AO14.2);
     •    The proposed development incorporates external design features that ensure that blank walls
          will not have a length exceeding 15 metres. Further, the development provides ample
          landscaping onsite to soften the development from the street and adjoining premises (AO14.3);
     •    The proposed garage doors do not exceed 6 metres wide (AO15.1);
     •    The area between the front fence along Opal Street and property boundary is landscaped,
          however, will not encroach the laneway (AO17.4);
     •    The external building facades utilise natural finishes (i.e. open timber balustrading etc) and
          lightweight construction including weatherboard cladding (AO18);
     •    The main roof of each building has a roof pitch no less than 5 degrees and has minimum 600mm
          eaves to at least 75% of the perimeter of the building (AO19.1);
     •    Parapet walls are not proposed (AO19.3); and,
     •    Any requirement to provide privacy treatments to particular windows can be conditioned as part
          of any future development approval (AO20.1-AO20.5).

The propsoed Dual Occupancy development does not comply with the following Acceptbale Outcomes of
the Zone Code:
    •    AO12.1 – reduced front setback to Ruby Street and Opal Lane, as well as a reduced side
         setback to the western boundary
    •    AO17.1 – front fence to be setback 1 metre and step in at maximum 5 metre intervals

The proposed development is considered to comply with the corresponding Performance
Outcomes of the abovementioned benchmarks, as demonstrated below within Table 2.


Table 2 Code Assessment against the specific areas of non-compliance - Medium Density Residential Zone
Code
 Performance Outcome                                       Acceptable Outcomes
 Building Setback                                          AO12.1
 PO12                                                      Buildings and structures meet the following minimum
 Buildings and structures are designed and sited to:       boundary setbacks:
      (a) provide a high level of amenity to users of           (a) for frontages — 6 metres
          the subject site and adjoining premises,
          including provision of visual and acoustic            (b) for side boundaries—
          privacy;                                                      i. 1.5 metres setback up to 4.5 metres
      (b) not unreasonably obstruct views or cause                          height;
          overlooking of private open space or                         ii. 2 metres setback between 4.5
          habitable areas of adjoining premises;                            metres and 7.5 metres height; and
      (c) provide adequate distance from adjoining
                                                                      iii. 2.5 metres where above 7.5 metres
          land uses;
      (d) preserve existing vegetation that will help                       height
          buffer development;                                   (c) for the rear boundary 6 metres
      (e) allow for space and landscaping to be
          provided between buildings including
          adequate area at ground level for
          landscaping with trees, shrubs, outdoor


ASTP Ref: 210705                                                                                   Page 9 of 14
Log in to download the original file

_ASTP Town Planning Report.pdf · 857 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.