Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA CIVIC submission
Attached to the e-mail MCU14/0106 Submission PM Object - Ralph Rogers.
Council Reference: MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 th 30 July 2015 The Assessment Manager Noosa Council PO BOX 141 TEWANTIN QLD 4565 Dear Sir/Madam, SUBMISSION OBJECTING TO THE PROPOSED NOOSA CIVIC EXPANSION Development Application for Material Change of Use of Premises for a major shopping centre expansion comprising: Commercial Business (Type 1 Office, Type 2 Medical, Type 3 Veterinary), Entertainment & Dining Business (Type 1 Food & beverages, Type 2 Recreation, amusement & fitness, Type 3 Bar), Education (Type 1 Childcare, Type 3 Adult, Type 4 Information), Open Space (Type 1 Sports and Recreation), Retail Business (Type 2 Shop & Salon, Type 4 Showroom, Type 7 Garden & Lifestyle Centre), Wellbeing (Type 2 Social), Service and Utility (Type 2 Installation), and Undefined Use (Temporary Markets) and Development Application for Operational Work for Interference with vegetation and Interfering with quarry material on State coastal land above high water mark within a Coastal Management District. Noosa Council Reference: MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 1.0 INTRODUCTION I, Ralph Rogers lodge this submission against the proposed expansion of the Noosa Civic by QIC Noosa Civic Pty. Ltd. (QIC proposal) as it is inconsistent with certain provisions within the Noosa Plan 2006 for the development of this particular site within the Shire Business Centre (SBC) and the applicant has not provided sufficient supporting information that the development application should be approved as proposed, despite this critical conflict. I have previously lodged submissions against past applications for expansion of the Noosa Civic and continue to state my opposition to the planned expansion. 2.0 GROUNDS RELIED ON IN MAKING THIS SUBMISSION The facts and circumstances detailed in this response to the QIC development application has enabled the me to compile grounds that confirm that this development application should be refused by Noosa Council. 1. The QIC application does not satisfy those Desired Environmental Outcomes (DEO) identified in Part 3 Section 3.1 of the Noosa Plan 2006 and in so doing disrupt the hierarchy and balance of local retail centres such as the Noosa Junction and Noosaville areas. Part 3 Section 3.1 of The Noosa Plan 2006 identifies Desired Environmental Outcomes (DEO) to strategically guide all land uses in achieving ecological sustainability and provide a considered and coordinated basis to guide development for that planning period as identified in the planning scheme and beyond. This strategic planning is at a local level both within the
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.