Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

Appendix 3. Planning Report [As Published] · 132007.2399

of 30

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

M1806
Page 18 of 19
November, 2007

The 600 metre buffer is also noted on the Plan of Development. However, it is noted the buffer
and Plan of Development were approved and adopted prior to the upgrading of the treatment
plant. A detailed odour assessment report as prepared by Pacific Air and Environment PTY LTD is
included within the application. The report supports the proposed development as it concludes
there will be no unacceptable odour impacts on the proposed residential use of precinct J. In
accordance with the findings of the assessment, no formal application to amend condition 14.1 of
the original rezoning approval is required as an approval by the Council will automatically override
condition 14.1 by virtue of s6.1.35B of the Integrated Planning Act 1997.

We make reference to an Engineering Report as prepared by Tate Engineers PTY LTD, which
demonstrates that key infrastructure can be managed in accordance with Council policy. The
Engineering Report forms part of the application.

7.0       STATE PLANNING POLICIES

State Planning Policy 1/92 – Development and Conservation of Agricultural Land

Not applicable to this application

State Planning Policy 1/02 – Development in the Vicinity of Certain Airports and Aviation Facilities

Not applicable to this application

State Planning Policy 2/02 – Planning and Managing Development involving Acid Sulfate Soils

We do not anticipate that any part of the subdivision will require excavation below 5 metres AHD
however, we are mindful that such a situation may occur. To this end we make reference to the
Geotechnical Report which accompanies the Development Application. We will not be in a position
to categorically state this until we are advised of the details of the approval and associated
conditions by the Council. When this information is available detailed calculations can be
undertaken and the amount of excavation, if necessary, within the hazard area can be identified.
We respectfully request that the Council impose a reasonable and relevant condition requiring that,
if necessary, an Acid Sulfate Soil Management Plan be prepared prior to the issuing of Operational
Works permits.

State Planning Policy 1/03 – Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Flood, Bushfire and Landslide

Policy Principle                                                       Comment
FLOOD
1. Development maintains the safety of people on the                   Flooding is not a consideration in the assessment of
development site from all floods up to and including the DFE           the proposed development on the subject site.
2. Development does not result in adverse impacts on people’s
safety or the capacity to use land within the floodplain.
3. Development minimises the potential damage from flooding to
property on the development site.
4. Public safety and the environment are not adversely affected
by the detrimental impacts of floodwater on hazardous materials
manufactured or stored in bulk.
5. Essential services infrastructure (e.g. on-site electricity, gas,
water supply, sewerage and telecommunications) maintains its
function during a DFE.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.1 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Appendix 3. Planning Report [As Published].pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.