Original source · versioned page text
2015-10-13 Planning & Organisation Agenda Attachment 2 to Item 7 Noosa Estuary and Lakes Restoration Assessment Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
12
Option Key actions Consequence for chosen indicators Other benefits Key uncertainties Cost Pre-mortem
estimate
Prawns Bream Whiting Mullet Birds Yabbies Crabs Biodiver
sity
terrestrial dunes,
beach and near-
shore areas
Wake Manage boat speed Increased aesthetic Implementation ability ? Lost investment due to
management and wake value How to achieve failure
“between Improve Improved safety for outcomes Loss of shoreline access
the lakes” commercial boat all users Policing and appreciation of the
design Shoreline estuary
stabilisation through
wake management
Increased pressure
elsewhere
*# Integrity of
ecotourism ventures
Improved water
filtration/quality
Estuary Reduce the Improved fishing Needs to be part of ? Community backlash
zoning recreational catch practice resulting in the package for No measurable
(emphasis on Increase catch and improved fish stocks improved commercial improvement in fisheries
rec. fishing) release programs fishing management
including training /
education
*
#^
Community response
Increased fishing
Provide support for pressure from
improved fish elsewhere
habitat
Permitting
Cessation of Closure of fishing Improved water Actual catch rates and Violence and backlash
commercial areas particularly quality current stock from fishing community
prawn between the lakes Improved benthic assessment No recovery of stocks
trawling Buyback of fishing habitat quality and Possibility for natural
licences sediment turnover recovery
Modified fishing Increased
practices recreational fishing
Decreased or
*# benefits through DIY
limited catch (size bait and target
or timing) species
Better Limit catch on Improved efficiency Area too limited in size ? Violence and backlash
management Noosa North Shore in commercial to have a measurable from fishing community
of
commercial
mullet
Provide pathways to
increase product
value
practices
Improved water
quality
impact on local stocks
Shifting fishing
pressure elsewhere -
No recovery of stocks
fishery Modify fishing
* #^
Increased mullet all caught
practices - commercial value of further north
– Positive effect on indicator species * shorebirds (e.g. migratory waders, oystercatchers etc.); # raptors; ^ seabirds; § consequence not able to be assessed due to a
– Negative effect on indicator species lack of specificity about the actions to be taken
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.