img-810092332-0001

10

1

Qe
Type 1 Local & Type 2 Shop, Education Type 3 Adult and Entertainment & Dining
Business Type 1 Food and Beverage (the development approval).

The development approval was granted subject to conditions.

On 21 November 2008, the Sunshine Coast Regional Council resolved to change the
development approval under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 by:

4.1. approving a change to conditions 1, 7, 8, 12, 15, 36, 38 and 55;
4.2 approving a change to Advice Conditions 2 and 3; and
4.3 including additional conditions of approval.

On 16 March 2010, the Sunshine Coast Regional Council resolved to make a permissible
change to the development approval by including additional condition numbers 65, 66
and 67.

On 11 February 2011, the Sunshine Coast Regional Council resolved to make a
permissible change to the development approval by extending the relevant period in
condition 19 to 17 February 2014 (the Amended development approval).

On 10 November 2014 the Appellant lodged a permissible change request under SPA
with the Respondent seeking:

7.1 changes to conditions 1, 7, 8, 10 to 12, 36 and 38 of the Amended development
approval; and

7.2 to delete condition 15 of the Amended development approval (the permissible
change request). :

The changes the subject of the permissible change request satisfy section 367 of SPA in
that the changes:

8.1 Would not result in a substantially different development;
8.2 Would not require referral to any additional concurrence agencies;

8.3 Would not trigger a new requirement for impact assessment, as the development
application has always required impact assessment;

8.4 Would not be likely to cause a person to make a properly made submission
objecting to the proposes changes; and

8.5 Would not result in the introduction of any prohibited development into the
proposal.

By way of notice dated 13 July 2015, the Respondent granted, in part, the permissible
change request.

The Appellant takes no issue with the Respondent's decision to change conditions 7, 8
and 38 of the Amended development approval.

The Appellant takes no issue with the Respondent's decision to delete condition 15 of the
Amended development approval.

Legal/44521643_1