Council archive · source document
Reference Document - MCU26 0001 & OPW26 0002 - AS PUBLISHED · MCU26/0001
Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Table 3 below is our qualitative assessment of landslide risk for the development site. A summary of
qualitative terminology for use in assessing risk to property is attached (taken from AGS 2007).
Table 3: Details of Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (AGS 2007)
Hazard Likelihood Consequence Assessed Risk Comments
Given the gentle to moderate natural gradients
Failure through through the site, it is considered Unlikely that a
very loose to landslide would develop in these materials, subject to
loose natural Unlikely Medium Low implementation of the recommendations in Section 6.
sands above the It is assessed that there could be a potential Medium
foundation depth impact from such instability so the resultant risk would
be Low as per AGS 2007.
The likelihood of a deep failure through the medium
Deep failure dense (or denser) natural sand below the proposed
through the foundation depths is assessed as Rare due to the lack
medium dense (or of precedence of such movements locally, no signs of
Rare Major Low
denser) sands any existing slope instability and apparent lack of
below the groundwater. Although the consequence of such a
foundation depth failure would be Major, the resultant risk is Low as
per AGS 2007.
The likelihood of a slide/failure through any temporary
retention system (sheet pile wall, contiguous pile wall
Temporary
or similar) as outlined in Section 6.4, is assessed as
instability through
Rare, subject to detailed design by a suitable qualified
temporary
Rare Major Low RPEQ engineer and construction by a specialist
retention system,
contractor which accounts for the required factors of
as discussed in
safety against slope instability. Although the
Section 6.4.
consequence of such a failure would be Major, the
resultant risk is Low as per AGS2007.
The potential impacts on slope stability of the development components have been assessed, and the
measures recommended below in Section 6 have been designed to mitigate those impacts.
Geotechnical Investigation
30 January 2026 | 25408-001-Rev0 10
Document Set ID: 25158026
24528612
Version: 1,
2, Version Date: 10/09/2026
13/02/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Reference Document - MCU26 0001 & OPW26 0002 - AS PUBLISHEDRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.