Original source · versioned page text
Town Planning Assessment Report
of driveways in one b) new lots adjacent to sensitive
space; and land uses include sufficient
vii) where not in a water area for buffering of
or sewerage service incompatible land uses; and
area, allow for water c) lot reconfiguration provides
storage tanks and for
suitable effluent shared access arrangements
disposal. wherever possible.
e) except where otherwise
specified in a local area code,
comply with the minimum lot
size specified in Table 9.5.1.4
Minimum Lot Size and
Dimensions
PO6 – Complies
PO6 No acceptable outcome provided The proposed
Development provides for irregular reconfiguration would create
shaped lots to be created only where: two lots that have
a) the creation of regular lots is boundaries matching
impractical such as at a curve in Marara Street which severs
the road or because of the Land.
topographical constraints;
b) safe access and visual
exposure to and from
the site can be provided, while
not adversely impacting on the
functionality of the surrounding
road network;
c) it is desirable to
avoid clearing of vegetation and
the fragmentation of habitat
in ecologically important areas;
and
d) the irregular lot is demonstrably
suitable for its intended
purpose.
Lot Layout
Site Responsive Design
PO7 AO7.1 AO7.1 – Not Applicable
Development provides for a lot layout If located in the Low density residential The flood prone land
and configuration of roads and pathways zone, Medium density residential associated with the site is
that is responsive to:- zone, High density residential not located within the
zone, Tourist accommodation specified zones.
a) the setting of the site within an zone or Community facilities zone and
urban or non-urban context; intended for a residential use, any new
b) any natural environmental lot is located outside the modelled
values present on, or adjoining flood level of the 1% AEP (1:100
the site; year ARI) water surface levels or
c) any natural hazards affecting where not modelled, above the highest
the site or adjoining land such known flood level.
that the number of properties or
persons at risk is not increased;
d) the terrain of the land, AO7.2 AO7.2 – Not Applicable
minimising the need for Flood immunity for development areas The proposal does not
earthworks; is not achieved by filling land below the involve filling to achieve flood
e) any places of cultural heritage 1% AEP (1:100 year ARI) flood level. immunity.
significance or character areas
Page 12 of 23
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (Town Planning Assessment Report.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.